[Vision2020] Tax Cut on Higher Incomes Advances

Fri Mar 2 15:30:18 PST 2012

If one were to vomit every time the Idaho Legislature passed an objectionable bill, surly they would succumb malnutrition. 

Donovan Arnold

From: Betsy Dickow <betsyd at turbonet.com>
To: 'Donovan Arnold' <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>; 'Tom Hansen' <thansen at moscow.com>; 'Moscow Vision 2020' <Vision2020 at moscow.com> 
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 11:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Tax Cut on Higher Incomes Advances

It does make me want to vomit.

From:Donovan Arnold [mailto:donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 10:18 AM
To: Betsy Dickow; 'Tom Hansen'; 'Moscow Vision 2020'
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Tax Cut on Higher Incomes Advances

Betsy,

"Disgusting" is a word you use when someone vomits in a restaurant. The word I would use is "unconscionable" or "abhorrent". What the Idaho Legislature did was consciously decide to cut life saving medical care in a time of crisis to thousands of its most medically vulnerable people in order to give a 19.5% state income tax cut to themselves and Idaho's wealthiest residents. This isn't disgusting, it is about as close to treason and human cruelty as a government entity in the United States can get away with without legal criminal prosecution. If I believed in a just God and voted to do this to His most vulnerable people placed in my charge, I would fear lighting for the rest of my natural life. I hope they enjoy their tax cuts and spend it quickly, because they won't be able to take it with them to where their Christian God will be sending them in the very near future. 

Donovan Arnold

From:Betsy Dickow <betsyd at turbonet.com>
To: 'Tom Hansen' <thansen at moscow.com>; 'Moscow Vision 2020' <Vision2020 at moscow.com> 
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Tax Cut on Higher Incomes Advances

This is disgusting, is it not?!

From:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Tom Hansen
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 4:10 AM
To: Moscow Vision 2020
Subject: [Vision2020] Tax Cut on Higher Incomes Advances

"'The governor has recommended that we not collect this money, that we’re collecting too much,' said Rep. Marv Hagedorn, R-Meridian, one of the bill’s 40 House co-sponsors."

So, Guv Butch's response to three years of budget cuts, drastically affecting education and those on Medicaid, is to give a tax cut to the upper income bracket and corporations because "we’re collecting too much"?

Well . . .

Today's tax cuts are tomorrow's budget cuts, right Butch?

Courtesy of today's (March 2, 2012) Spokesman-Review.

---------------------------
Tax cut on higher incomes advances
Idaho measure also lowers tax rate on corporations
BOISE – A $36 million tax cut for Idaho’s top earners is roaring through the Idaho Legislature, backed by Gov. Butch Otter and co-sponsored by a majority of the members of the Idaho House.

The move comes even as the state is reeling from three years of deep budget cuts to everything from schools to Medicaid, very few of which are being restored.

“The governor has recommended that we not collect this money, that we’re collecting too much,” said Rep. Marv Hagedorn, R-Meridian, one of the bill’s 40 House co-sponsors.

“It’s probably the best economic development bill we’ve seen all year,” declared House Majority Leader Mike Moyle, HB 563’s lead sponsor. The bill passed the House on a 49-20 vote Thursday and now heads to the Senate.Otter opened the door to the tax cut by challenging lawmakers at the start of this year’s legislative session to enact $45 million in unspecified tax cuts. This proposal, at $35.7 million, is slightly less, but so is the figure lawmakers adopted for the state budget next year. They set a revenue forecast $33.3 million below the governor’s, meaning they have that much less to spend, whether for tax cuts, state services or to refill the state’s drained reserves.

The bill would lower Idaho’s top individual income tax rate from 7.8 percent to 7.4 percent, and lower the corporate tax rate from 7.6 percent to 7.4 percent. That would take $35.7 million a year out of the state’s tax revenue stream starting next year.

Opponents of HB 563 – 12 Democrats and eight Republicans in the House – say the state can’t afford a tax cut when it’s still struggling with the impact of three years of budget cuts. They’re also raising questions about whether trimming taxes really constitutes economic development.

“Every study I’ve seen says cutting taxes in and of itself does nothing to further economic growth, even though I recognize that’s a strong belief by many in this body,” said Rep. Bill Killen, D-Boise, who added that investing in higher education would have more impact. “I certainly don’t think giving money back in the hope that it’ll somehow generate jobs is a very intelligent way to go about it.”

House Tax Chairman Dennis Lake, R-Blackfoot, is a high-profile opponent of the bill. “We are creating a structural deficit in our revenue stream that we cannot deal with, without at some time in the future raising taxes,” Lake said.

He warned that to sustain the permanent tax cut, Idaho would have to see 7.8 percent growth in state revenues next year. Lawmakers adopted a revenue forecast showing just 4.5 percent growth next year.

Lake, who isn’t seeking re-election, told the House, “I’m fortunate, I’m not going to be here next year to deal with that issue, but some of you are, and you’d better think about it very carefully.”

Rep. Dick Harwood, R-St. Maries, said he supports putting the money back into the pockets of taxpayers. “When we take tax dollars from people and we take more than we can actually use, we’re saying we can use it more than you do,” Harwood said.

But Rep. Brian Cronin, D-Boise, noted that Idaho voters have been approving school property tax levy increases to make up for state funding cuts, “district after district, year after year, to compensate for the deficit in K-12 appropriations that we’ve failed to deliver. … It’s a shell game.”

Idaho’s new state Department of Commerce chief, Jeff Sayer, is backing the bill, but he’s not suggesting the tax cut by itself will create jobs. Instead, he lauded its symbolic value in discussions with businesses looking to relocate.

“One of the challenges we have is our tax rate is not competitive,” Sayer said. “Underneath that, our effective rates are lower, but the challenge is window dressing. … We don’t make the cut, because our corporate rate is higher and that sticks out.”

---------------

How they voted

North Idaho’s House members in Districts 1-6 voted in favor of the tax-cut bill, except for Reps. Tom Trail, R-Moscow, and Shirley Ringo, D-Moscow.

---------------

Who would benefit from tax cut

Idaho’s proposed $35.7 million tax cut would go only to those paying Idaho’s corporate income tax, and to top earners who now pay the state’s highest rate for individual income tax. For a single person who doesn’t itemize and takes the standard deduction, that equates to a minimum gross income of $36,260 to start getting any tax break. For a married couple filing jointly with no dependents, it’s $72,520. For a couple with two children, it’s $79,920. Just over 17 percent of Idaho income tax filers would benefit from the cut; taxes for lower earners wouldn’t change.

---------------------------

Seeya later, Moscow.

Tom Hansen
Post Falls, Idaho

"If not us, who?
If not now, when?"

- Unknown

=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
              http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20120302/6e93e198/attachment-0001.html>