[Vision2020] Court sides with AP, news groups over execution

[lfalen]

I should have said: The First Amendment.
-----Original message-----
From: lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:01:36 -0700
To: "Tom Hansen" thansen at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Court sides with AP, news groups over execution

> The First.
> Roger
> -----Original message-----
> From: Tom Hansen thansen at moscow.com
> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:50:38 -0700
> To: lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Court sides with AP, news groups over execution
> 
> > Roger Falen suggests:
> > 
> > "I think that there is a constitutional right for the public and the press to view executions, but I don't know why anyone would want to."
> > 
> > And if the prisoner's wife and/or children do not want the execution televised, what then?
> > 
> > Question, Mr. Falen:  Where in the Constitution does it stipulate the "right for the public and the press to view executions"?
> > 
> > Seeya round town, Moscow.
> > 
> > Tom Hansen
> > Moscow, Idaho
> > 
> > "If not us, who?
> > If not now, when?"
> > 
> > - Unknown
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jun 10, 2012, at 14:41, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I think that there is a constitutional right for the public and the press to view executions, but I don't know why anyone would want to.
> > 
> > 
> 
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================