[Vision2020] Rick’s Religious Fanaticism

[Donovan Arnold]

Actually, Santorum is politically wise to bring religion to the forefront of this presidential race for several reasons. First, the mainstream voters in the Republican Primaries are very Judo-Christian and are hungry for such a candidate. Second, bringing religion to the front brings up Romney's religion in an indirect way into focus. Being Mormon is a negative in most conservative circles. Finally, it energizes those that hate Obama because they think he is not really an American Citizen and is a Muslim, non-Christian.
 
It is a winning primary strategy for Santorum to talk about religion, abortion, same-sex marriage, and family values as much as possible because it plays to his strengths and to his opponents weaknesses very well. 
 
It he continues to speak about this subjects during the general election, then I think he would be digging himself into a hole. 
 
Romney should try as hard as possible to paint Santorum as a religious extremist that could never win a general election and will bring down the entire party if at the top of the ticket. Instead of trying to move further to the right, he should try and move Santorum so far to the right he alienates most Republicans as well. 
 
Obama should try to get Democrats to vote for Santorum in the Republican Primary and help keep his campaign funded. A weakened Romney or a Santorum nomination is the best outcome in a General Election for Obama. 
 
Donovan Arnold

From: Art Deco <art.deco.studios at gmail.com>
To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 8:37 AM
Subject: [Vision2020] Rick’s Religious Fanaticism





February 21, 2012
Rick’s Religious FanaticismBy MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON 
Rick Santorum has been called a latter-day Savonarola. 
That’s far too grand. He’s more like a small-town mullah. 
“Satan has his sights on the United States of America,” the conservative presidential candidate warned in 2008. “Satan is attacking the great institutions of America, using those great vices of pride, vanity and sensuality as the root to attack all of the strong plants that has so deeply rooted in the American tradition.” 
When, in heaven’s name, did sensuality become a vice? Next he’ll be banning Barry White. 
Santorum is not merely engaged in a culture war, but “a spiritual war,” as he called it four years ago. “The Father of Lies has his sights on what you would think the Father of Lies would have his sights on: a good, decent, powerful, influential country — the United States of America,” he told students at Ave Maria University in Florida. He added that mainline Protestantism in this country “is in shambles. It is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it.” 
Satan strikes, a Catholic exorcist told me, when there are “soul wounds.” Santorum, who is considered “too Catholic” even by my über-Catholic brothers, clearly believes that America’s soul wounds include men and women having sex for reasons other than procreation, people involved in same-sex relationships, women using contraception or having prenatal testing, environmentalists who elevate “the Earth above man,” women working outside the home, “anachronistic” public schools, Mormonism (which he said is considered “a dangerous cult” by some Christians), and President Obama (whom he obliquely and oddly compared to Hitler and accused of having “some phony theology”). 
Santorum didn’t go as far as evangelist Franklin Graham, who heinously doubted the president’s Christianity on “Morning Joe.” 
Mullah Rick, who has turned prayer into a career move, told ABC News’s Jake Tapper that he disagreed with the 1965 Supreme Court decision striking down a ban on contraception. And, in October, he insisted that contraception is “not O.K. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.” 
Senator Sanitarium, as he was once dubbed on “The Sopranos,” sometimes tries to temper his retrogressive sermons so as not to drive away independent and Republican women who like to work, see their kids taught by professionals and wear Victoria’s Secret. 
He told The Washington Post on Friday that, while he doesn’t want to fund contraception through Planned Parenthood, he wouldn’t ban it: “The idea that I’m coming after your birth control is absurd. I was making a statement about my moral beliefs, but I won’t impose them on anyone else in this case.” 
That doesn’t comfort me much. I’ve spent a career watching candidates deny they would do things that they went on to do as president, and watching presidents let their personal beliefs, desires and insecurities shape policy decisions. 
Mullah Rick is casting doubt on issues of women’s health and safety that were settled a long time ago. We’re supposed to believe that if he got more power he’d drop his crusade? 
The Huffington Post reports that Santorum told Philadelphia Magazine in 1995 that he “was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress.” Then, he said, he read the “scientific literature.” 
He seems to have decided that electoral gold lies in the ruthless exploitation of social and cultural wedge issues. Unlike the Bushes, he has no middle man to pander to prejudices; he turns the knife himself. 
Why is it that Republicans don’t want government involved when it comes to the economy (opposing the auto bailouts) but do want government involved when it comes to telling people how to live their lives? 
In a party always misty for bygone times bristling with ugly inequities, Santorum is successful because he’s not ashamed to admit that he wants to take the country backward. 
Virginia’s Republican governor, Bob McDonnell, touted as a vice presidential prospect, also wants to drag women back into a cave. 
This week, public outrage forced the Virginia Legislature to pause on its way to passing a creepy bill forcing women seeking an abortion to undergo an ultrasound, which, for early procedures, would require a wand being inserted into the vagina — an invasion that anti-abortion groups hope would shame some women into changing their minds once they saw or heard about traits of the fetus. 
Democratic Delegate Lionell Spruill hotly argued that the bill would force “legal rape.” “I cannot believe that you would disrespect women and mothers in such a way,” he chided colleagues. “This legislation is simply mean-spirited, and it is bullying, bullying women simply because you can.” 
While the Democratic-controlled Maryland House of Delegates just passed a bill that would allow same-sex marriage, the Republican-controlled Virginia Legislature passed a bill allowing private adoption agencies to discriminate against gays who want to be parents. 
The Potomac River dividing those states seems to be getting wider by the day. 

-- 
Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
art.deco.studios at gmail.com

=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
              http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20120222/32f1ce6c/attachment.html>