[Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench

[Tom Hansen]

Here's another purpose for guns (local)



Courtesy of Daniel Foucachon at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rldK8hgnyps

Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .

"Moscow Cares"
http://www.MoscowCares.com
  
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
 

On Dec 28, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> Do whatever the owner of the gun wants to use it for, I guess. For example, I've used one to seriously mutilate some pop cans.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> From: Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>; 
> To: Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com>; 
> Cc: moscowlocksmith at gmail.com <moscowlocksmith at gmail.com>; moscowrecycling at turbonet.com <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>; vision2020 at moscow.com <vision2020 at moscow.com>; 
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench 
> Sent: Sat, Dec 29, 2012 12:38:28 AM 
> 
> ... in order to ...
> 
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I would say that the purpose of a gun is to propel a projectile out the barrel with some guarantees of accuracy and force.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> From: Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>; 
>> To: 'Gary Crabtree' <moscowlocksmith at gmail.com>; 
>> Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>; 
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench 
>> Sent: Fri, Dec 28, 2012 7:58:11 PM 
>> 
>> Oh yes, what are guns designed to do?
>> 
>> Kill.
>> 
>> And your point of banning one type of gun did not lead to the banning of others…
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Andy Boyd
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Gary Crabtree [mailto:moscowlocksmith at gmail.com] 
>> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 11:31 AM
>> To: Andy Boyd
>> Cc: Art Deco; vision2020 at moscow.com
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> "Since the assault weapons ban has been lifted, there have been more violent crimes."
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I can't speak to "violent crimes" over all as I don't know how it's defined but gun violence is down. The assault weapons ban had zero effect on gun crime.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> "I don’t wish to take away all guns. And I don’t imagine the benefits, they are real."
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Since you are willing to take away many thousands of guns to solve a problem that reflects less than two percent of gun violence, how many guns would you be willing to ban to prevent over sixty two percent? Suicide by firearm only requires but a single shot. Why would any sane American believe that once one class of firearm was made illegal that others wouldn't soon follow? People such as yourself will always have a rationalization for taking away the rights of others
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> g
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> g
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Since the assault weapons ban has been lifted, there have been more violent crimes.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> =======================================================
>>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>                http://www.fsr.net
>>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
> 
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20121228/8e4dea22/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 42278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20121228/8e4dea22/attachment-0001.jpeg>