[Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench

[Joe Campbell]

Do you own a semiautomatic weapon, Gary? If not, then not owning one is no
big deal. If so, what exactly do you do with it? Why is having it more of a
benefit than saving the life of that precious child? I'm really trying to
get this but I don't.

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Gary Crabtree
<moscowlocksmith at gmail.com>wrote:

> A question for you, Low-T...
>
> What is the magic number? What length is too great if it will save but a
> single precious child? Because if the cost/benefit ratio on this issue is
> the gold standard you better get ready to lay down the law on solid food
> (choking) open bodies of water (drowning) and life in general (accidents)
> All are more responsible for child mortality then firearms.
>
> g
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>> Question, gc . . .
>>
>> What is the magic number?  How many deaths of children are required
>> before we should become concerned about the uncomfortably easy access to
>> semi-automatic weapons and high capacity magazines?
>>
>> You say that you support armed teachers.  Suppose a (or some) teacher(s)
>> are unable to teach for a given period of time due to illness or some
>> school commitment.  Should we require that substitute teachers be armed?
>>
>> Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .
>>
>> "Moscow Cares"
>> http://www.MoscowCares.com
>>
>> Tom Hansen
>> Moscow, Idaho
>>
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Gary Crabtree <moscowlocksmith at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> "Since the assault weapons ban has been lifted, there have been more
>> violent crimes."
>>
>>
>> I can't speak to "violent crimes" over all as I don't know how it's
>> defined but gun violence is down. The assault weapons ban had zero effect
>> on gun crime.
>>
>> "I don’t wish to take away all guns. And I don’t imagine the benefits,
>> they are real."
>>
>> Since you are willing to take away many thousands of guns to solve a
>> problem that reflects less than two percent of gun violence, how many guns
>> would you be willing to ban to prevent over sixty two percent? Suicide by
>> firearm only requires but a single shot. Why would any sane American
>> believe that once one class of firearm was made illegal that others
>> wouldn't soon follow? People such as yourself will always have a
>> rationalization for taking away the rights of others
>>
>> g
>>
>>
>>
>> g
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Since the assault weapons ban has been lifted, there have been more
>>> violent crimes.
>>
>>
>> =======================================================
>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>                http://www.fsr.net
>>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com <Vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> =======================================================
>>
>>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20121228/27b9d4c0/attachment.html>