[Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench

Joe Campbell philosopher.joe at gmail.com
Fri Dec 28 09:58:10 PST 2012


I'd like to know the answer to this question, too.

And I'd like to know how banning these weapons would be an impingement on
one's "rights." Joe

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>wrote:

> I don’t wish to take away all guns. And I don’t imagine the benefits, they
> are real.  Since the assault weapons ban has been lifted, there have been
> more violent crimes.****
>
> Please tell me why anyone needs an assault weapon?****
>
> ** **
>
> Andy Boyd****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Gary Crabtree [mailto:moscowlocksmith at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2012 5:04 PM
> *To:* Andy Boyd
> *Cc:* Art Deco; vision2020 at moscow.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench****
>
> ** **
>
> You've got to admire the folks who have the fortitude to give away the
> rights of others to achive the benifits they imagine they will get in
> return.****
>
>  ****
>
> g****
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>
> wrote:****
>
> It seemed to me the article summed it up well.****
>
> “Note that the N.R.A. had never before scored a judicial confirmation
> vote. Note also that Sonia Sotomayor had no record on the N.R.A.'s issues.
> <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/>****
>
> The N.R.A. had all the reason it needed to oppose Sonia Sotomayor:
> maintenance of its symbiotic relationship with the Republican Party. Once
> it announced its opposition and its intention to score the vote, Republican
> support for the nominee melted away. Only seven Republicans voted for
> confirmation. <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/>”****
>
>  ****
>
> So does all the members of the NRA support guns for everone?****
>
> Let’s face it, they call them assault rifles for a reason.  If you need to
> shoot one off, join the military.****
>
>  ****
>
> Andy Boyd****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Gary Crabtree [mailto:moscowlocksmith at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:33 PM
> *To:* Andy Boyd
> *Cc:* Art Deco; vision2020 at moscow.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench****
>
>  ****
>
> Why do you suppose that the NRA's membership is larger the the top three
> leading anti-firearms groups memberships (extremely conservative est.)
> combined?****
>
>  ****
>
> That said, we're still stuck with Sotomayer and her patron. Tell me again
> how they determine for the majority who is elected and appointed.****
>
>  ****
>
> g****
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:56 P.M, Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>
> wrote:****
>
> And yet they alone have so much influence, on a single issue, that it can
> determine for the majority of citizens who is elected and appointed?****
>
> Seems unfair.  ****
>
> That being said, “boo” to all the representatives that cave to a single
> interest over the wellbeing of our nation.****
>
>  ****
>
> Andy Boyd****
>
> Manager/Education Coordinator****
>
> Moscow Recycling****
>
> 208 882 0590****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Gary Crabtree [mailto:moscowlocksmith at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 27, 2012 1:42 PM
> *To:* Andy Boyd
> *Cc:* Art Deco; vision2020 at moscow.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench****
>
>  ****
>
> "So the NRA gets to decide who gets to be on the supreme court?"****
>
>  ****
>
> No. They get to have an preference and work toward it's realization just
> the same as any organization comprised of American voters.****
>
>  ****
>
> Yours for a little less over wrought discussion,****
>
> g****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20121228/da65b9e2/attachment.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list