[Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench

[Andy Boyd]

It seemed to me the article summed it up well.

" <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/> Note that the N.R.A. had never
before scored a judicial confirmation vote. Note also that Sonia Sotomayor
had no record on the N.R.A.'s issues. 

 <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/> The N.R.A. had all the reason it
needed to oppose Sonia Sotomayor: maintenance of its symbiotic relationship
with the Republican Party. Once it announced its opposition and its
intention to score the vote, Republican support for the nominee melted away.
Only seven Republicans voted for confirmation."

 

So does all the members of the NRA support guns for everone?

Let's face it, they call them assault rifles for a reason.  If you need to
shoot one off, join the military.

 

Andy Boyd

 

From: Gary Crabtree [mailto:moscowlocksmith at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:33 PM
To: Andy Boyd
Cc: Art Deco; vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench

 

Why do you suppose that the NRA's membership is larger the the top three
leading anti-firearms groups memberships (extremely conservative est.)
combined?

 

That said, we're still stuck with Sotomayer and her patron. Tell me again
how they determine for the majority who is elected and appointed.

 

g

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:56 P.M, Andy Boyd <moscowrecycling at turbonet.com>
wrote:

And yet they alone have so much influence, on a single issue, that it can
determine for the majority of citizens who is elected and appointed?

Seems unfair.  

That being said, "boo" to all the representatives that cave to a single
interest over the wellbeing of our nation.

 

Andy Boyd

Manager/Education Coordinator

Moscow Recycling

208 882 0590 <tel:208%20882%200590> 

 

From: Gary Crabtree [mailto:moscowlocksmith at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 1:42 PM
To: Andy Boyd
Cc: Art Deco; vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] The N.R.A. at the Bench

 

"So the NRA gets to decide who gets to be on the supreme court?"

 

No. They get to have an preference and work toward it's realization just the
same as any organization comprised of American voters.

 

Yours for a little less over wrought discussion,

g

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20121227/a124219b/attachment-0001.html>