[Vision2020] who pays for Megaload cops?

Saundra Lund v2020 at ssl1.fastmail.fm
Sun Sep 4 11:53:01 PDT 2011

In part, Paul wrote:

“As a property tax payer, I'd rather pay for general police coverage that way than to have to have a credit card handy when I dial 911.”


Bingo.  Which is why, in addition to double-charging protestors for services they’ve already paid for, the suggestion that the protestors pay for the additional police coverage was the real “asinine exercise in pure stupidity.”


And, not that I want to speak for Donovan because he’s really good at doing so for himself, but I don’t think he was just talking about police services but rather infrastructure issues as well.


But, I’m suspecting you knew that & just couldn’t pass up the opportunity to mischaracterize or oversimplify his argument.




Saundra Lund

Moscow, ID


The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.

~ Edmund Burke



From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Paul Rumelhart
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 9:56 AM
To: Donovan Arnold
Cc: Moscow Vision 2020
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] who pays for Megaload cops?


Are you sure you want the police to start charging for their services on a case-by-case basis?  


On 09/04/2011 09:22 AM, Donovan Arnold wrote: 

Well, the good news for both Jay and Paul is that they will get to exercise their belief that property taxpayers should fork out the extra cash to pay for the extra needed resources by the city to deal with the problems and expenses caused by Exxon Mobile driving all their megaloads coming through Moscow on their next tax bill or rent hike. (Boy was that a run on sentence or what?)


Donovan Arnold


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20110904/c1ec94ea/attachment.html>

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list