[Vision2020] The Latest on Bustamante . . .

[Art Deco]

I haven't read the judge's decision in this case, but why do the records need to be redacted?  Were such reactions allowed under the decision?  I am afraid the baby is going to be thrown out with the bathwater.

w.


From: Tom Hansen 
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 8:07 AM
To: Moscow Vision 2020 
Subject: [Vision2020] The Latest on Bustamante . . .


. . . was back on October 3rd when Judge Stegner ruled that UI must publicly release records of Bustamante.

http://www.khq.com/story/15603625/media-outlets-seek-release-of-professors-records

I know that it's been three weeks since that decision, but . . . it's football season, ok?

Besides, it takes a lot of time to redact years and years of documents.

Seeya round town, Moscow.

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho



=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20111025/59c8585d/attachment.html>