[Vision2020] Carl, Keep Calling Rachel back

Donovan Arnold donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 19 14:21:58 PST 2011

That is what I do when I get an "urgent call" from a solicitor. It is usually a recording, and this person doesn't exist, they just leave a number to a call station. So I just keep calling back insisting that I speak with the person who called me (who doesn't exist) about a "personal urgent matter". They eventually get pissed after about 10 to 30 calls (tolerance levels vary) asking to only speak to "Rachel" (who doesn't exist) about her "urgent and timely message" and agree to X your number off their list. Everything else I have tried doesn't work. This tactic seems rude and aggressive, but it is the nature of the beast you are dealing with. The more time spent on a wasted call with you means less time for them to make their quotas which is the only thing they care about. 
Donovan Arnold

 From: Carl Westberg <idahovandal1 at live.com>
To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 1:01 PM
Subject: [Vision2020] This Rachel person

From "Credit Card Services" is starting to tick me off.  Over the last few weeks, I've received my "second and final notice" to answer this urgent call approximately 1,137 times.  I'm beginning to not like Rachel.......and how in the world do these crooks get away with this?  
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20111119/182f6e4a/attachment.html>

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list