[Vision2020] "Friends at Freeze Community Church" Package Reported to Post Office as "Suspicious"

[Darrell Keim]

The video is already availabe for free at 180movie.com, Tom.  I doubt if
your findings will be different than mine RE the nondescript packaging.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Moscow Cares <moscowcares at moscow.com> wrote:

> If the originators of these DVDs and/or packages seriously believe in the
> messages contained within these items, why have they not distributed this
> message as an article/ad in a local newspaper and/or broadcast this message
> from a local radio station?
>
> Or, like the postcard hoax scum, do they prefer the apparently untraceable
> anonymity of a non-returnable postal item.
>
> I assure you, fine peeps of the Viz, open discussion of this topic is
> merely in its infancy, as I will be in possession of a copy of the DVD in
> question (courtesy of one of you fine community-conscious V-peeps).  Once
> in possession of the DVD, I intend on examining its properties thoroughly
> and publicly posting my documented findings . . . before I post the video
> itself publicly.
>
> Once this has been accomplished, "Moscow Cares" will maintain the item
> online and encourage public discussion while considering other progressive
> options.
>
> Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .
>
> "Moscow Cares"
> http://www.MoscowCares.com
>
> Most sincerely,
>
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Ted Moffett <starbliss at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I received two copies of this package, one at my street address, one at
> my PO box.  I brought the packages, unopened of course, to the post office
> to report them as "suspicious," given unknown origin, no return address,
> and unsolicited.
> >
> > How do I know this package is not from a Unabomber or anthrax letter
> psycho?  Any package that is from an unknown origin, no return address, and
> unsolicited, should not be opened, it seems to me, unless somehow verifying
> the contents.  It would even be easy to fake the official appearing post
> office code, lettering, etc. to make it appear as though it came through
> the US mail, when it did not, when the package was placed in a mailbox by
> whoever...
> >
> > I was told the post office sent them, and that that class of mail does
> not have to have a return address.  I requested that the packages be
> "returned to sender," but the post office employee said the packages would
> then be thrown away, not returned to sender.  She advised I throw them
> away, if I don't want them.  I was going to ask if there was any legal
> means of the post office supplying the identity of the individual or
> individuals who sent this mailing, but refrained from pushing the issue
> this far.
> >
> > I left both packages on the writing desks in the main downtown Moscow
> post office, so they are there for the taking, or they were a few minutes
> ago.
> > ------------------------------------------
> > Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> >               http://www.fsr.net
> >          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20111107/2019b8bd/attachment.html>