[Vision2020] The Year of Living Adulterously

lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com
Thu May 19 10:13:29 PDT 2011


The selection is not good. I am not in favor of Gingrich. Rommey is not too bad but has some problems. I think a good ticket would be Pawlenty and West. Kain may be alright, but don't know enough about him.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Art Deco" deco at moscow.com
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:36:29 -0700
To: "Vision 2020" vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] The Year of Living Adulterously

>  
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> May 18, 2011
> The Year of Living Adulterously
> By GAIL COLLINS
> What is it with Republicans lately? 
> 
> Nobody wants to run for the presidential nomination. Mike Huckabee said God told him to stay on Fox News. NBC told Donald Trump to stay on "Celebrity Apprentice." 
> 
> Whatever happened to putting your country first? Our forefathers would never have passed up the presidency for anything less than the Charlie Sheen role on "Two and a Half Men." 
> 
> The Republicans are terrified that they'll wind up with Mitt Romney, who has been fund-raising like crazy and seems to be planning a campaign based on the slogan: "Money can't buy love, but it can definitely purchase a grudging, defeatist acceptance." 
> 
> Some party leaders are looking hopefully at Mitch Daniels, the governor of Indiana, who's promised to make up his mind this month. If he runs, one thing you are not going to get from Mitch Daniels is the politics of joy. Have you ever seen "Game of Thrones" on HBO? It's about a mythical kingdom that sends some of its young men to the remote tundra to live in perpetual celibacy and guard a 700-foot-tall wall of ice. Their reaction is very similar to the way Mitch Daniels looks when he talks about running for president. 
> 
> Daniels is apparently worried that a presidential run might prove embarrassing to his wife, who ditched him and the kids and ran off to California to marry a doctor and then later recanted everything and came back. I think it is pretty safe to say that this topic might come up. 
> 
> Which brings us to sex. What is it with Republicans lately? Is there something about being a leader of the family-values party that makes you want to go out and commit adultery? 
> 
> They certainly don't have a lock on the infidelity market, and heaven knows we all remember John Edwards. But, lately, the G.O.P. has shown a genius for putting a peculiar, newsworthy spin on illicit sex. A married congressman hunting for babes is bad. A married congressman hunting for babes by posting a half-naked photo of himself on the Internet is Republican. 
> 
> A married governor who fathers an illegitimate child is awful. A married governor who fathers an illegitimate child by a staff member of the family home and then fails to mention it to his wife for more than 10 years is Republican. 
> 
> A married senator who has an affair with an employee is a jerk. A married senator who has an affair with an employee who is the wife of his chief of staff, and whose adultery is the subject of ongoing discussion at his Congressional prayer group, is Republican. 
> 
> We haven't even gotten to Newt Gingrich yet! 
> 
> Gingrich is the best-known of the second-string Republicans who are ready, willing and eager to take on Romney for the nomination. The question is whether social conservatives will resent the fact that he was having an adulterous relationship with his current wife while she was a House of Representatives staffer and he was trying to impeach Bill Clinton for the Monica Lewinsky affair. Also, this week, Politico reported that in 2005 and 2006, Gingrich had an account with Tiffany's that sometimes ran to $500,000 in debt. 
> 
> Never have we had sex issues with so many layers. It shows you how far we have evolved as a nation. In the old days it was: Warren Harding making whoopee in the presidential coat closet: yes or no? 
> 
> Really persistent sexual misbehavior says something about the character of the person involved. In Gingrich's case, we have a failure-to-settle-down problem that extends way beyond matrimony. He can't even hang onto a position on Medicare for an entire week. This man is a natural for an occupation that rewards attention deficit. Maybe God actually meant to tell Newt to stay on Fox News, but accidentally shipped the message to Huckabee. 
> 
> As to Governor Daniels, the voters are unlikely to give a fig about the interesting past of his wife, Cheri. But if he wants to protect her from the embarrassment of being asked about it 24/7, perhaps he could just declare her off limits. The news media has generally respected those kinds of rules when it comes to presidential candidates' children, as long as said offspring don't show up on reality shows or as teen-abstinence ambassadors for a shoe store foundation. 
> 
> Of course, a wife who is off limits would not be able to campaign for her husband. I think that would be terrific. Finally, we could end the tradition that a presidential candidate's spouse is running for something, too. If we want a first family to obsess over, we should just hire a king and queen. 
> 
> Don't know how the social right would feel about this. But there's always Mitt Romney. 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________
> Wayne A. Fox
> 1009 Karen Lane
> PO Box 9421
> Moscow, ID  83843
> 
> waf at moscow.com
> 208 882-7975
> 
> 



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list