[Vision2020] Mega-loads Ultimate Impact: Geological Society of America Oct. 2011 Meeting: Archean to Anthropocene

Ted Moffett starbliss at gmail.com
Tue May 17 22:01:15 PDT 2011


I just attempted to post to right-mind.us, in response to what can
hopefully be read at the following website, from "Mr. Ed", regarding
the Moscow City Council and Mayor Cheney's (odd he does not include
Mayor Cheney's name, as far as I could determine. He called her "the
city mother!") actions regarding the mega-loads,

http://right-mind.us/blogs/blog_0/archive/2011/05/17/80582.aspx

what I intended to be a fierce satire of climate change denialists,
and their abdication of responsibility for human impacts profoundly
altering our Earth's climate, a satire that implies we abandon
scientifically compromised thinking about local vs. state or national
or international politics, as if the physics of the Earth's
atmosphere/climate follows political boundaries:  CO2 molecules
released into the atmosphere in Moscow, Idaho or Canada or China are
shared impacts on the global climate system.

The response indicated perhaps the moderator would review the comments.

I don't know for sure if my comments were even sent or received, but I
will check to see if my satire appears on right-mind.us.

I wonder...

On 5/17/11, Ted Moffett <starbliss at gmail.com> wrote:

> It's discouraging to read in today's newspaper (
> http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/boise/2011/may/17/moscow-city-council-votes-roll-out-welcome-mat-megaloads/
> ) that the Moscow City Council is no dupe of the global warming
> disaster hysterics, such as NASA climate scientist James Hansen, who
> opposes development of the Canadian tar sands, and has pleaded for the
> governments involved (including Canada, the US and Norway) to stop
> large scale tar sands development.
>
> Consider the statement of climate scientist James Hansen, a primary
> propagandist, in his acceptance speech for the 2010 Sophie Prize:
> http://www.sofieprisen.no/Articles/514.html
>
> "But our governments have no intention of solving the fossil fuel and
> climate problem, as is easy to prove: the United States, Canadian and
> Norwegian governments are going right ahead developing the tar sands,
> which, if it is not halted, will make it impossible to stabilize
> climate. Our governments knowingly abdicate responsibility for young
> people and future generations."
>
> If the Moscow City Council accepted this propaganda as truth, they
> might have paused regarding affirming the tar sands bound mega-loads
> passing through Moscow.  They might have contemplated issuing a public
> statement regarding anthropogenic climate change and the implications
> of the ultimate goals of tar sands development, facilitated by the
> mega-loads, that will profoundly impact every human on this planet,
> including all the residents of Moscow, Idaho, and future generations
> on Earth for centuries and potentially millennia.
>
> However, though the Moscow City Council has apparently seen through
> our climate hoax plot, others can be either bought or brainwashed.
>
> The deep cover subversion of prominent scientific organizations by the
> Knights Carbonic (read here about the secret plot:
> http://www.monbiot.com/2009/11/23/the-knights-carbonic/ ) is
> progressing well on many fronts, with propaganda regarding human
> impacts on climate continuing to brainwash thousands of scientists,
> despite the truth regarding this hoax being exposed by FOX news,
> Tea Party loyalists, US Sen. Inhofe (R. Okla.) and the Climategate
> email hack emails from the Climatic Research Unit, that revealed the
> collaborations among the climate science conspirators to rig the
> climate data.
>
> For example, consider the Geological Society of America headlining
> their upcoming Oct. 2011 annual meeting with the theme "Archean to
> Anthropocene," implying that human impacts on Earth are somehow
> connected to a new period in Earth's geological or climate history.
> Ha!
>
> The ease with which gullible scientists, and the peer review process
> for science publishing integrity, has been manipulated to promote
> bogus climate science is a testament to the success of modern
> propaganda scare tactics, employed by the liberal political
> establishment to justify big government socialist control.  Of course,
> many of these scientists are simply motivated by the money, career
> advancement or fame gained from the scare tactic of global warming
> promoting big grants and books sales.
>
> We are pleased to have these naive, profiteering, or politically
> motivated scientists be pawns in the Knights Carbonic's grand plan for
> big government control!  Read about the propaganda these scientists
> will spread at the Geological Society of America 2011 meeting in
> October this year in Minneapolis at websites below:
>
> GSA 2011 Annual Meeting and Exposition: Archean to Anthropocene:
>
> http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2011/
>
> At website below. published in GSA today Feb. 2008, hoax science
> propaganda paper titled "Are we now living in the Anthropocene?"
> answering this question in the affirmative:
>
> http://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/18/2/pdf/i1052-5173-18-2-4.pdf
>
> The Vatican is also part of the global warming hoax, with more
> propaganda just released in May, 2011, also claiming we are in the
> "Anthropocene," as can be read at the website below:
>
> Fate of Mountain Glaciers in the Anthropocene:
>
> http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdscien/2011/PAS_Glacier_110511_final.pdf
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett
>



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list