[Vision2020] Saint Augustine: "Hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue."

Thu May 12 07:07:29 PDT 2011

Mayor Chaney and all,

Thanks for the response and communication. I know you are concerned about this issue.

However, I think asking people to ignore the larger concern of mega-loads entering downtown Moscow and to learn and ask questions about how the loads will come through, is bit like asking people to accept they are going to be raped and concentrate on learning methods to make rape less painful. We need to kick, scream, bite, slap, punch, pull hair, whatever we can to show we are not consenting and are vehemently opposed to all their plans. 

If the people remain silent and appear consenting of a mega-load plan by proposing a plan or supporting one proposal over another, it will be presented as the plan that the people of Moscow want, when in fact, we don't want it at all. Why be in a position of explaining we are opposed to being violated, but if we are, this is how we prefer to be violated?

This is not about one mega-load coming through Moscow. This is about dozens, and maybe even potentially hundreds of mega-loads coming through if we give even an inch and consent or help plan it. It is also about the rights of citizens, property owners, and protection of the environment.

Trying to resolve this issue by appealing to the ITD is pointless since members are appointed by people that are funded by the oil companies. Moscow doesn't have the power to deny or approve a permit, but it does have other informal and formal powers to slow down, divert, or stop the shipments that have not been exercised to their fullest extent. 

How many phone calls have been made to Larry Echohawk, who is the US Assistant Secretary of Interior? Or how about the Governor of Montana? How about Tribal Councils those land will be violated? How about the EPA? How about Canada? Stop them anywhere and we stop them from coming through Moscow. 

I think you would regret not having done everything you can while being Mayor to stop the first shipment of mega-loads by the time the 30th or 40th one comes rumbling through downtown in the dead of night. 

Donovan Arnold

--- On Wed, 5/11/11, Nancy Chaney <nchaney at ci.moscow.id.us> wrote:

From: Nancy Chaney <nchaney at ci.moscow.id.us>
Subject: RE: Saint Augustine: "Hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue."
To: "Ted Moffett" <starbliss at gmail.com>, "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com>, "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>, "Craine Kit" <kcraine at frontier.com>, "Sue Hovey" <suehovey at moscow.com>, "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 1:01 PM

All: Thank you for copying me on this exchange. All of the points are important, and reflect our common concern for this place, including our community and the planet.

The point of tonight's meeting is to exchange information about a particular proposal, to be factually informed and to ask questions and state concerns for the best possible outcome. 

It is not within the City's authority to approve or deny permits for the ExonMobil loads. It is within ITD's authority to do so. I encourage attendees to give ITD the tools it needs to make a reasoned and defensible decision, including addressing whether transport comports with the standard of necessity (i.e. whether it is inescapable or compulsory), whether there are feasible alternatives, whether dimensions and weight have been reduced to the extent possible/practicable, public safety, access to public facilities, and to anticipate placing conditions on such aspects as allowable times of use, acceptable durations of delay and definition thereof, routes, indemnity for injury to persons or property, allowable conditions of operation (weather, darkness, traffic), and requirements for flagging, signing, and lighting, etc.  

The topic of dependence on fossil fuels and its environmental implications is vitally important, but cannot be resolved at tonight's meeting. I have scheduled a follow-up report and synopsis of tonight's meeting for the City Council meeting on Mon 5/16, and asked that Moscow Sustainable Environment Commission take on the task of developing recommendations based on public input and its own research for the City Council's consideration. There will be future opportunities for the public to address those larger concerns. It would be counterproductive to open that discussion tonight. Thank you for your consideration.

Nancy J. Chaney, Mayor
City of Moscow
206 E. 3rd St./P.O. Box 9203
Moscow ID 83843
Ph: (208) 883-7021
www.ci.moscow.id.us

________________________________________
From: Ted Moffett [starbliss at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:48 AM
To: Donovan Arnold; Nancy Chaney
Cc: Art Deco; Vision 2020; Craine Kit; Sue Hovey; Tom Hansen
Subject: Saint Augustine: "Hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue."

On 5/11/11, Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Tom Hansen,
>
> Thanks for the history lesson. But that doesn't change any of the facts on
> the ground. The meeting is still a farce because it won't be to discuss the
> concerns of the Idaho and Moscow residents unless they are technical
> questions about how the transportation will proceed.

We are to accept that discussion of other so called non-local issues
regarding the mega-loads are off limits, that this meeting is to focus
only on the impacts to the city of the loads passing through the area.
So, to use a worn out yet apt analogy, if the mega-loads were holding
concentraton camp prisoners on their way to the gas chambers, as long
as the impacts to the city were acceptable, the morality or economics
etc. of the ultimate non-local goals of the mega-loads is not to be
addressed.

Actually, my analogy is not exactly correct, given that the ultimate
consequences of the mega-loads will have profound direct local
impacts, eventually.  The oil sands development in Canada is a
profound moral issue for everyone on this planet, impacting economics
and the lives of millions of people.  I'll let NASA climate scientist
James Hansen clarify the issue, by quoting excerpts from his
acceptance speech for the Sophie Prize, given the focus on Norway's
Statoil investments in Canadian tar sands development:

Speech by Sophie Prize winner Dr. James E. Hansen

June 22th 2010

http://www.sofieprisen.no/Articles/514.html

Our planet today is close to climate tipping points. Ice is melting in
the Arctic, on Greenland and Antarctica, and on mountain glaciers
worldwide. Many species are stressed by environmental destruction and
climate change. Continuing fossil fuel emissions, if unabated, will
cause sea level rise and species extinction accelerating out of
humanity's control. Increasing atmospheric water vapor is already
magnifying climate extremes, increasing overall precipitation, causing
greater floods and stronger storms.

But our governments have no intention of solving the fossil fuel and
climate problem, as is easy to prove: the United States, Canadian and
Norwegian governments are going right ahead developing the tar sands,
which, if it is not halted, will make it impossible to stabilize
climate. Our governments knowingly abdicate responsibility for young
people and future generations. I have been disappointed in
interactions with more than half a dozen nations. In the end, they
offer only soothing words, "goals" for emission reductions at far off
dates, while their actual deeds prevent stabilization of climate.

The Sophie Prize provides a new opportunity to draw attention to the
actions that are needed to stabilize climate. Norway may be the best
place, with its history of environmentalism. I can imagine Norway
standing tall among nations, taking real action to address climate
change, drawing attention to the hypocrisy in the words and
pseudo-actions of other nations.

So I wrote a letter to the Prime Minister suggesting that the
government, as the majority owner of Statoil, should intervene in
planned tar sands development. I appreciate the polite response, by
letter, from the Deputy Minister of Petroleum and Energy. The
government position is that the tar sands investment is "a commercial
decision", that the government should not interfere, and that a "vast
majority in the Norwegian parliament" agree that this constitutes
"good corporate governance". The Deputy Minister concluded his letter
"I can however assure you that we will continue our offensive stance
on climate change issues both at home and abroad".

A Norwegian grandfather, upon reading the Deputy Minister's letter,
quoted Saint Augustine: "Hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to
virtue."

The Norwegian government's position is a staggering reaffirmation of
the global situation: even the greenest governments find it too
inconvenient to address the implication of scientific facts. Perhaps
our governments are in the hip pocket of the fossil fuel industry –
but that is not for science to say.

What I can say from the science is this: the plans that governments,
including Norway, are adopting spell disaster for young people and
future generations. And we are running out of time.

Stabilizing climate is a moral issue, a matter of intergenerational
justice. Young people, and older people who support the young and the
other species on the planet, must unite in demanding an effective
approach that preserves our planet.
------------------------------------------
Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett

>
> In all fairness, Council President Krauss was correct that the
> mega-loads were not Moscow's specific concern because at the time he said it
> the loads were not scheduled to come through Moscow.
>
> The only thing people of Moscow are being offered is lip service and
> information on how the mega-loads are going to come roaring through downtown
> in the dead of night. Where is the meeting on how and what is being done to
> prevent this from happening? Until that happens, people are just being
> played with by the politicians, lawyers, and the big oil companies that fund
> them.
>
> Remember Governor Cecil D. Andrus and how he  blocked the Feds from entering
> the state with nuclear waste?
>
>  "I've got a state policeman and 15 of his friends, and all of them are
> prepared to do what is necessary if that truck makes it inside the borders
> of this state."
> http://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/08/us/idaho-governor-blocks-shipments-of-atom-waste-to-us-dump-site.html
>
> Too bad we don't have politicians with courage and a working moral compass
> today that really look out for the people they represent! The rights of
> local citizens and property owners, and our pristine irreplaceable
> environment should not be ignored or put at risk of destruction in favor of
> the most privileged billionaires that offer nothing in return for their
> trespasses against us.
>
> Donovan Arnold
>
>
> --- On Wed, 5/11/11, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Questions About Semi-Megaloads in Moscow
> To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>, "Art Deco"
> <deco at moscow.com>, "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>, "Craine Kit"
> <kcraine at frontier.com>, "Sue Hovey" <suehovey at moscow.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 8:27 AM
>
>
> A little history lesson here, Mr. Arnold . . .
>
> On June 28, 2010 the Idaho Transportation Department began what was
> expected to be a series of community discussions in Moscow, Lewiston, and
> Kamiah.  ITD, Conoco, and ExxonMobil were under the impression that these
> forums were to be conducted similar to a "high school career day" where
> representatives from Conoco and ExxonMobil would present a short speech
> from their respective displays.  Shortly after Rep. Tom Trail arrived at
> the meeting, was informed of the meeting's format, and had a "discussion"
> with the ITD rep, the forum was re-formatted to include a Q&A portion.
>
> http://www.moscowcares.com/highway12/ITDmtg_062810.htm
>
> ----------------------
>
> On August 16, 2010, during the public commentary portion of the Moscow
> City Council session, it was suggested that Moscow adopt a resolution
> against the transporting of oversized loads on Highway 12.
>
> To which Moscow City Council President Wayne Krauss responded, on
> September 6th, that the megaloads were none of Moscow's concern.
>
> http://www.moscowcares.com/highway12/MoscowCC_PubCom_Hwy12Res.htm
>
> ----------------------
>
> On April 4, 2011 the Idaho Transportation Department presented a report to
> the Moscow City Council outlining US95 and I90 as alternate routes for a
> portion of the Highway 12 megaloads.  In strong suggestive language (using
> terms like "right" and "ethics") Mayor Chaney asked that a public forum be
> conducted in Moscow so that Moscow's citizens may be heard on this issue.
>
> http://www.moscowcares.com/040411_05_MegaloadsITD.htm
>
> ----------------------
>
> On April 18, 2011, during the Moscow City Council session, Mayor Chaney
> presented an update concerning the potential for megaloads being
> transported through Moscow on US95.
>
> http://www.moscowcares.com/041811_05_Megaloads.htm
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> So . . . you see, Mr. Arnold.  In my opinion, where the people of Moscow
> are concerned, Mayor Chaney has their back.
>
> Perhaps your anguish would be better aimed at Moscow City Council
> President Wayne Krauss who publicly expressed that these megaloads are not
> of Moscow's concern.
>
> Footnote, V-peeps:  Although Rep. Tom Trail and Moscow City Council
> President Wayne Krauss are both members of the Republican Party, there are
> three words that clearly define the difference between them . . .
>
> CONCERN FOR CONSTITUENTS
>
> You decide who's got your back next time you step into the voting booth.
>
> Seeya round town, Moscow.
>
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 6:40 am, Donovan Arnold wrote:
>> Sue,
>> Â
>> I don't think that Mayor Cheney believes that the other issues are not of
>> concern. I just don't think the Mayor can restrict what people can ask,
>> only what she and her invited speakers are willing to address. I think
>> having a public forum simply to take only technical questions is rather
>> pointless unless you are an engineering student. Most people won't have
>> technical questions about the transport ifÂ explained the process in a
>> well written article posted on the internet and published in the paper. I
>> think the meeting is a farce if the real questions and concernsÂ people
>> have are not even allowed to be asked.
>> Â
>> How about this question? What can the people do to stop these
>> mega-transports?
>> Â
>> Donovan Arnold
>>
>> --- On Tue, 5/10/11, Sue Hovey <suehovey at moscow.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Sue Hovey <suehovey at moscow.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Questions About Semi-Megaloads in Moscow
>> To: "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com>, "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>,
>> "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>, "Tom Hansen"
>> <thansen at moscow.com>, "Craine Kit" <kcraine at frontier.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2011, 11:45 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom, Donovan & All,
>> Â
>> I donâ€™t see that framing the discussion around local issues is a signal
>> that the Mayor has declared the rest to be ok.Â  It seems to me the
>> meeting was set to discuss impacts on our city. Those are the concerns
>> which will determine whether they get a permit to transport the rigs.Â
>> Obviously the other risks are not important to the Governor, ITD, and
>> other folks or this wouldnâ€™t have already happened in Idaho.Â Â Â  As a
>> group of citizens concerned with this whole mess--how Exxon Mobile and
>> other oil extractors are willing to do any damage to any environment, and
>> any people simply to turn a profitâ€”you point out a legitimate discussion
>> topic for Moscow citizens, and I bet the mayor is willing to have that
>> meeting, too.Â  Why not ask her.Â
>> Â
>> Sue H.
>>
>>
>> Â
>>
>> From: Art Deco
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:39 PM
>> To: Vision 2020
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Questions About Semi-Megaloads in Moscow
>> Â
>>
>> These megaloads are an extremely great deal for us!
>> Â
>> We can help kill lots of First Nations Canadians and others, cause the
>> greatest environmental disaster in the history of North America, and help
>> our sneakiest global competitors, the Chinese, who own the majority
>> interests in the tar sands projects, to prosper even more at our expense.
>> Â
>> Paraphrasing Langston Hughes:Â  Everyone benefits from these megaloads.
>> Big oil gets to ride, we gets to watch them ride.
>> Â
>> w.
>> Â
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Donovan Arnold
>> To: Tom Hansen ; Craine Kit
>> Cc: Moscow Vision 2020
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 11:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Questions About Semi-Megaloads in Moscow
>> Â
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> My Questions;
>> Â
>> How did the Mayor acquire the ability to dictate what questions can an
>> cannot be asked? I understand informing people they will only answer
>> questions they feel are related to the transport of the megaloads, but to
>> tell people what they can and cannot ask seems more like a scripted event
>> than an actual Q&A session.
>> Â
>> Why should any people be required to allow these megaloads to be run
>> through their towns when they are not designed to handle this kind
>> transport? I don't think it would hurt Exxon Mobile financiallyÂ  to find
>> another means of transporting their product without disrupting the quality
>> of life, safety, and well being of others with lesser means than them.
>> Â
>> Donovan Arnold
>> Â
>> Â
>> --- On Tue, 5/10/11, Craine Kit <kcraine at frontier.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Craine Kit <kcraine at frontier.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Questions About Semi-Megaloads in Moscow
>> To: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
>> Cc: "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2011, 9:47 AM
>>
>>
>> Of course, one must ask about the impact of the convoy of 30 or soÂ
>> vehicles--which is said to take an hour to pass any particular point.
>>
>> Kit Craine
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 10, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Tom Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> Courtesy of today's (May 10, 2011) Moscow-Pullman Daily News.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> OUR VIEW: Questions about semimegaloads in Moscow
>>> Lee Rozen, for the editorial board
>>> Posted on: Tuesday, May 10, 2011
>>>
>>>
>>> In the middle of about 60 nights this year, Imperial Oil/ExxonMobilÂ
>>> wants
>>> to send oil equipment convoys that are a block or so long, two lanesÂ
>>> wide
>>> and 16 feet tall rumbling and blinking north through downtown Moscow.
>>>
>>> The Korean-built equipment would head from Lewiston via U.S. HighwayÂ
>>> 95,
>>> Interstate 90 and Montana to the Kearl Oil Sands in Alberta. To getÂ
>>> each
>>> load from Lewiston to the Benewah County line should take one night
>>> between 10 p.m. and 5:30 a.m. Officials promise traffic delays of noÂ
>>> more
>>> than 15 minutes.
>>>
>>> But the travel plan is under review, and neither Idaho nor Montana has
>>> issued the necessary permits, or said when they will. The Moscow
>>> semi-megaload route has been chosen because of the delays in getting
>>> megaloads up the scenic U.S. Highway 12 corridor.
>>>
>>> ExxonMobil and Idaho Transportation Department officials haveÂ
>>> deigned to
>>> listen to Moscow's concerns about that at 7 p.m. Wednesday at theÂ
>>> Hamilton
>>> Indoor Recreation Center, 1724 E. F St.
>>>
>>> At that meeting. ITD and oil company officials will talk first, andÂ
>>> then
>>> take questions and comments from those who have signed in. Also, youÂ
>>> can
>>> email your thoughts to the ITD at comments at itd.idaho.gov, and the City
>>> Council at skalasz at ci.moscow.id.us.
>>>
>>> Mayor Nancy Chaney apparently has declared the morality of ExxonMobil
>>> profits, the Kearl Oil Sands project and fossil fuel consumption
>>> off-limits for discussion Wednesday night.
>>>
>>> ExxonMobil made profits of $10.7 billion in first quarter 2011. SomeÂ
>>> say
>>> the Kearl Oil Sands project is destroying the Canadian environment and
>>> killing residents of the area.
>>>
>>> Still, that leaves plenty of questions that need answers:
>>>
>>> Who makes sure delays are only 15 minutes? What happens if theyÂ
>>> aren't?
>>>
>>> Will all cross-streets in Moscow be closed?
>>>
>>> Is it a delay if traffic keeps moving at 15 miles an hour behind the
>>> convoy? (The ITD says it isn't a delay; federal rules say it is.)
>>>
>>> Who pays for moving power lines and stoplights out of the way?
>>>
>>> Will this semi-megaload convoy be likely to wake me up when it goesÂ
>>> by my
>>> house or apartment?
>>>
>>> Will you notify shippers - and the media so they can alert theÂ
>>> public - in
>>> advance of a convoy?
>>>
>>> Once permits are issued, can their terms be changed without notice?
>>>
>>> What if state police escorts get called to an emergency? Will thatÂ
>>> stall
>>> the convoy?
>>>
>>> What if Montana won't let the semi-megaloads in?
>>>
>>> Let's hope we hear some good answers.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Seeya there, Moscow.
>>>
>>> Tom Hansen
>>> Moscow, Idaho
>>>
>>> "This is the 'Mouse that Roared,' 'David and Goliath' and 'Avatar' all
>>> rolled into one.Â  We must remember that the thousands of citizensÂ
>>> involved
>>> in this effort to protect their personal and family safety, their
>>> businesses and their lifestyles are confronting some of the largest
>>> international corporations in the world."
>>>
>>> - Linwood Laughy
>>>
>>>

> "The Pessimist complains about the wind, the Optimist expects it to
> changeand the Realist adjusts his sails."
>
> - Unknown
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20110512/948cf593/attachment-0001.html 