[Vision2020] FW: Angry Hens

[Rosemary Huskey]

From: Rosemary Huskey [mailto:donaldrose at cpcinternet.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 5:08 PM
To: 'Kai Eiselein'
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Angry Hens

 

Nope, two people is an myob (generally) situation – even I draw the line
about some information.  Three people, if one of them is a child, you
betcha.  And, Old Navy is too edgy for me, but thanks anyhow.  I’m more Old
Flannel.  Think Megs Bennett, Kai.

Rose

 

 

 

From: Kai Eiselein [mailto:fotopro63 at hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 3:53 PM
To: donaldrose at cpcinternet.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Angry Hens

 

The simple question is, "Does society have the right to choose what is
acceptable in relationships between two people?"
It appears that the answer has changed from, "No." to "Yes."
Nice job at trying to portray me as a supporter of this guy, or pedophilia,
but that ain't gonna happen, lady. I've always stated that society has the
right to say what is acceptable.
I hear Old Navy has a good selection of flip flops. 

  _____  

From: donaldrose at cpcinternet.com
To: fotopro63 at hotmail.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Angry Hens
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 15:10:18 -0700

1.  What does it say about you that you imply same sex marriage is the
equivalent of  a church arranged marriage for a pedophile who consequently,
will have instant, unimpeded access to the children he fathers?  Answer:
nothing very good

2.  Help me to understand why you think this community finds pedophilia
socially acceptable.  I don’t think that even rank and file Kirkers think
that.  The pity is they are unable to challenge their pastor and elders.
Brainwashing and that membership oath they take to support the church
hierarchy brings dissent to a dead stop.

3.  I source all my “claims” about the Kirk right back to the source of
them, the Kirk.

4.  I don’t comment on Doug’s doctrinal stances – with the exception of his
self-serving, piggish philosophy on the role of women, (not supported
scripturally, by the way)  and those happy slaves he clearly knew nothing
about.  Now that I think about it, other than Calvin, he doesn’t seem to
know much about anything in the academic sense, certainly not History.  He
can really bottle and sell snake oil though. 

5.  I can’t speak for the community “liberals” who in my opinion are more
concerned with drinking the right kind of wine, wearing clothes made out of
bamboo fiber, and supporting the democratic party in Idaho – than I would
ever be.  In short they just aren’t my kind of people – and I am sure that
that is a great relief to them.  As for co-existing, that opens the door to
all kinds of scum.  Maybe you would be ok, living cheek to jowl to a member
of the Aryan Nation, Fred Phelps, and/or Newt Gingrich. (free speech and all
that).  I’m not.  So I live in the sticks and don’t put tired old cliché
ridden bumper stickers on my car.  I did have a great “Cowboy Up” cling-kind
of decal on my back window but some jackass stole it.

6.  I understand that keeping your trap shut when something really offensive
and quite possibly dangerous is going on works splendidly for backboneless
wimps.  For me, not so much.  There is something about being your brother
(or sisters) keeper that is tape looped in my brain.

Do hope you have a splendid day, Kai.  I’m going to go make a quilt and
watch some deer.

Rose

 

 

From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of Kai Eiselein
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:38 PM
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Angry Hens

 

Saundra, you seem to have missed my point.
The same people who engaged in much gnashing of teeth over anti-gay marriage
laws a few years ago are now gnashing their teeth over what appears to be a
marriage that is completely legal.
As I argued before, it is the community's right to choose what is socially
acceptable. That argument was met with plenty of derision right here on the
ol' viz. Now it seems that position has changed and a number of people who
disagreed with my argument then have proven my point, in spades, I might
add.
Anybody for a big steaming helping of hypocrisy?
As for Wilson, I haven't read any of his books, pamphlets, comic books,
novels or flyers. I'm sorry, I'm just not all that interested in his
religious or world views, so I cannot comment on what he may or may not have
said based soley on the word of someone who appears to have an axe to grind
with him.
If there is a legal issue, then by all means take it to the courts, council,
commission, or wherever it needs to be addressed.
This constant screeching about every little thing is just plain childish and
I believe it goes deeper than any legal issues. In fact, I believe it is an
ideological clash and despite all of the "Coexist" stickers on cars in this
town, there is a deep seated hatred towards anybody or anything that doesn't
fit in with the local liberal lockstep.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20110505/b0655715/attachment-0001.html