[Vision2020] The green hijack of the Met Office is cripplingBritain

Paul Rumelhart godshatter at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 8 09:43:01 PST 2011


Well, I'm glad we've got that all worked out. 

Paul

Joe Campbell wrote:
> Of course he has the right, Tom. Anyone can talk about whatever they
> wish. I just wouldn't talk about issues of scientific confirmation
> without a PhD. I'm just expressing my own preference -- what "I
> wouldn't do."
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
>   
>> Joe Campbell stated:
>>
>> "What I wouldn't do is continue to harp on an area of empirical science
>> if I lacked a PhD in science, especially if one was available and I
>> wanted to get a PhD anyway . . . "
>>
>> Although I strongly agree with you, Joe, I believe that Mr. Rumelhart has
>> every right to discuss empirical science.  He simply cannot discuss
>> empirical science from a position of authority . . . say, like somebody
>> with a PhD in science can..
>>
>> Tom Hansen
>> Moscow, Idaho
>>
>> "The Pessimist complains about the wind, the Optimist expects it to change
>> and the Realist adjusts his sails."
>>
>> - Unknown
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   



More information about the Vision2020 mailing list