[Vision2020] U of I Sustainability Symposium Wed. 3-30-11: "McKibben calls for global uprising against fossil fuels"
Paul Rumelhart
godshatter at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 2 12:24:55 PDT 2011
On 04/01/2011 11:44 AM, Ted Moffett wrote:
> There was no mention of rising sea levels from climate change, which
> should always be emphasized in discussions of climate change impacts.
> Even if adaptation to negative climate changes on land (heat waves,
> flooding, drought, fires, desertification, agricultural failures,
> species extinction, etc.) are more successful than might be predicted,
> the global impact of only a one meter rise in sea level by 2100 (and
> futher future increases based on positive long term feedbacks) would
> be immense, including displacement of human populations and
> destruction of important coastal infrastructure and agriculture:
> "Global sea level linked to global temperature" Proceedings of the
> National Academy of Sciences:
> http://www.pnas.org/content/106/51/21527.full
I'm afraid the numbers just don't add up. To obtain the frequently
cited 1m sea level increase by 2100, the average rate of increase would
need to be:
1m = 1000 mm, 2100 - 2011.5 = 88.5 yrs, avg rate of increase = 1000 mm /
88.5 yr = 11.30 mm/yr
This paper
(http://www.jcronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00157.1) from
the Journal of Coastal Research gives a value derived from U.S. tide
gauges of 1.7 mm/yr. That's off the required amount by a factor of
6.6. Satellite altimeters give readings of around 3.15 mm/yr since
1993, which conflicts with the tide gauge record. This is still short
of the needed average increase by a factor of 3.5.
So, to get there, we need an acceleration in the rate of increase,
right? Well, unfortunately, the paper cited above
(http://www.jcronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00157.1)
concludes that there has been no acceleration in sea level rate of
increase in U.S. tide gauge records during the 20th century.
So while it's not impossible that we'll get a 1m increase in sea level
rise by 2100, it doesn't look likely at this point without a rapid
acceleration in sea level rise starting right now. And the longer we
wait before we see a rapid acceleration in sea level rise, the faster it
will have to happen to reach that number.
Paul
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list