[Vision2020] Muslims are Part of Our Culture

[Garrett Clevenger]

thank God...


Sep 7, 2010 10:44:56 AM, lfalen at turbonet.com wrote:

===========================================

A Constitutional Convention is not needed. We just need to adhere to the one we have.
>Roger


>-----Original message-----
>From: Garrett Clevenger garrettmc at verizon.net
>Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:49:00 -0700
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: [Vision2020] Muslims are Part of Our Culture
>
>> 
>> GS writes:
>> 
>> "Be it peace-loving Muslims or radical terrorists Muslims behind the
>> funding and construction of the Park 51 mosque, based on ancient and
>> recent history I'm astounded that Ms Rivetti cannot see the culturally
>> insensitive nature of this mosque."
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Yeah, you guys, didn't you know the terrorists won?  They were able 
>to get Americans to join the modern crusades and dump our values.
>> 
>> That means we spend hundreds of billions of dollars and countless lives 
>(giving Islamic crusaders another recruiting tool), and forget about our civil liberties 
>and Constitution in our self-righteous rage.
>> 
>> They even have their ally Glenn Beck urging us to be more like mid-east 
>religious fanatics who bow down to "God" 5 times a day.  That sure is 
>one way to take "the Great Satan" (the US) down.
>> 
>> In 10 years when we are all compliant (and forget about separation of church 
>and state) perhaps we'll be less sensitive to real or imagined trespasses.
>> 
>> Of course Christianity has its own demons, but hey, if it's our own 
>guys doing bad for the "greater good" then what's a little evil now 
>and then?
>> 
>> Only our guys deserve forgiveness, right?
>> 
>> 
>> But seriously, while I don't care if the mosque is built or not, it 
>does seem that sensitive conservatives are once again willing to usurp our Constitution 
>to make them feel better.
>> 
>> Admittedly, I'm very sensitive to fanatics trampling on our Constitution 
>so I wish these people would stop being so childish and learn to respect what was 
>fought for so hard. You can't pass religious laws and you can't keep people 
>from practicing their religion.
>> 
>> It would be dangerous precedent if government begins regulating religion. 
>It would be an irony if that precedent backfires and these same religious nuts find 
>themselves regulated.  Hmm, maybe that wouldn't be so bad after all.
>> 
>> Anybody up for a Constitutional Convention?
>> 
>> Garrett Clevenger
>> 
>> =======================================================
>>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>>                http://www.fsr.net                       
>>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
>