[Vision2020] Defense Cuts in Benefits and Personnel Proposed
Kenneth Marcy
kmmos1 at verizon.net
Mon Mar 1 07:41:10 PST 2010
On Monday 01 March 2010 05:59:42 Tom Hansen wrote:
<snip>
> A Senate committee looking to hold down federal spending is being
> advised to consider cutting the size of the military, ending careers
> short of retirement and reducing post-service benefits for
> veterans.
<snip>
> Williams, formerly a defense analyst with the nonpartisan
> Congressional Budget Office, suggested lawmakers could:
>
> Save money on health care by increasing enrollment fees,
> deductibles and co-payments for the military's Tricare program.
>
> Cut long-term health care costs by allowing fewer people to
> stay in the military until retirement.
>
> Pay working-age retirees not to sign up for Tricare and
> instead get health insurance from their post-service employer.
<snip>
> Adams said he foresees no scenario that would require major ground
> force deployments for counterinsurgency or stabilization missions,
> and suggested that future force planning should examine the
> opportunities to limit force growth or even reduce numbers to
> reflect this declining requirement for ground forces. He also
> recommended a defensewide rebalancing of combat and non-combat
> billets so more people are available for combat missions.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is absolute BULL SH*T!
I realize that these expenditures represent an income source for you,
but from a government-wide, macro-economic perspective, these kinds
of expenditures are ripe for consideration during any discussion of
fiscal restraint. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities notes
that defense is a rapidly growing share of the federal budget, while
domestic appropriations have shrunk.
"Funding for defense and related areas has been growing far faster
than any other part of the budget, much faster in fact than Social
Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Moreover, defense remains the
fastest growing area of the budget even if one excludes the costs of
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the global war on terror."
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=125
Ken
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list