[Vision2020] Teenagers and responsibilty

[Kai Eiselein]

So, on one hand we have those who advocate sending teens to the doorstep.
On the other we have educators who think they have the right to invade the 
homes of students.
Both camps are equally disturbing.

>From AOL News:
School Used Laptops to Spy on Students, Suit Says
By David Knowles

(Feb. 18) -- A Pennsylvania high school stands accused of spying on its own 
students with the very computers it gave them.

Pennsylvania's Lower Merion School District boasts an impressive program 
that loans nearly 1,800 high school students a laptop with which to work at 
home. Superintendent Christopher McGinley said at the beginning of the 
school year that the program "ensures that all students have 24/7 access to 
school-based resources and the ability to seamlessly work on projects and 
research at school and at home."

The problem, according to a new lawsuit, is that the computers gave school 
officials the potential of having 24/7 visual contact with students wherever 
they may be, and whatever they may be doing.

A 10th-grader at Harriton High School in Rosemont, Pa., Blake Robbins, 
brought his school-issued laptop home with him on Nov. 11. The next day, 
however, he says Harriton's vice principal, Lindy Matsko, confronted the 
student about what she considered inappropriate behavior in the boy's home. 
As evidence, Matsko produced a photograph taken inside Robbins' home by the 
laptop's webcam.

The boy's father, Michael Robbins, contacted the school after learning of 
the incident. He confirmed that the webcams could be activated remotely by 
school personnel, enabling them to view students in their homes.

Blake Robbins' parents have filed the lawsuit on behalf of their son. It 
claims that the school district never warmed students that the webcams could 
be used to monitor their actions.

Harriton High School declined to comment on the case, referring calls to the 
Lower Merion School District's public relations manager, Doug Young.

"We can categorically state that we are -- and have always been -- committed 
to protecting the privacy of our students," Young told the Philadelphia 
Inquirer. "We have referred this matter to our attorneys for appropriate 
legal action and plan to communicate with parents and students with more 
information as it becomes available."

Late Thursday, McGinley posted a formal apology to parents and students on 
the district's Web site, attempting to explain the protocol for activating 
the laptops' webcams.

"District laptops do contain a security feature intended to track lost, 
stolen and missing laptops," McGinley wrote. "The security feature, which 
was disabled today, was installed to help locate a laptop in the event it 
was reported lost, missing or stolen so that the laptop could be returned to 
the student."




----- Original Message ----- 
From: <vision2020-request at moscow.com>
To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:20 AM
Subject: Vision2020 Digest, Vol 44, Issue 121


> Send Vision2020 mailing list submissions to
> vision2020 at moscow.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/vision2020
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> vision2020-request at moscow.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> vision2020-owner at moscow.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Vision2020 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: One Way to Save the State Lots and Lots of Money
>      (Donovan Arnold)
>   2. Re: Moscow Sidewalk/Crosswalk Bicycle/Pedestrian Accidents &
>      Code (Donovan Arnold)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:15:01 -0800 (PST)
> From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2008 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] One Way to Save the State Lots and Lots of
> Money
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com, Kenneth Marcy <kmmos1 at verizon.net>
> Message-ID: <374708.57433.qm at web44703.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Marcy PhD,
> ?
> Judging from your prior lectures on the V, and limited original content, 
> my posts are not to be read by you, for the sake of your insanity and 
> inability to understand tongue in cheek posts; which 90% of my posts 
> contain (charcter flaw I know).
> ?
> There is nothing more drab and unproductive than a poster like Marcy, 
> PhD,?that simply?lecures endlessly?and parroting exactly what everyone 
> else is saying and thinking with no sense of humor and/or originality, no 
> new points, just volumes of the SSSS (Same Subject Same S***) piled higher 
> and deeper.
> ?
> Marcy PhD, try?lecturing something new, interesting, constructive, or 
> thought provoking instead of copying and pasting everyone else's posts and 
> putting your name on it.
> Your should exercise?YOUR freedom of speech, not your neighbors.
> ?
> Your Friend,
> ?
> Donovan Arnold
>
> --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Kenneth Marcy <kmmos1 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
> From: Kenneth Marcy <kmmos1 at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] One Way to Save the State Lots and Lots of Money
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 6:49 AM
>
>
> On Thursday 18 February 2010 13:51:38 Donovan Arnold wrote:
>> Not wasting $60 million???
>
> First, from whom did those sixty million dollars come? After the
> recent Risch rush to regressive revenue raising, changing from richer
> to poorer tax sources, it's likely that those who lost the most to
> their new taxation also stand to lose the most economic opportunity
> to their future lack of educational resources traditionally supplied.
> So, who, exactly, is entitled to judge wastefulness of these dollars?
> ?
>> Of course,?Donovan, would?think this is a great idea. Why?
>
> Perhaps because Donovan's thinking is of a meager and insubstantial
> sort, insufficiently well-connecting the relevant relations among the
> parties and facts of the situation? Or maybe Donovan is in a vocal
> mood, wondering if he can yet again stir the Vision2020 conversation.
>
>> Because 16-19 year olds cannot listen to adults?and already know
>> everything. If you don't believe me, just ask them. They are the
>> experts on every subject. They already know far more than their
>> parents, grandparents, and the rest of world, combined. :P
>
> Sometimes good communication among parents and children allows a good
> transition from parental household to the child's emancipation. Other
> times, not. Comments have been made for generations through eons,
> from the ancients onward. Some were notable, as this from Samuel
> Langhorne Clemens (Mark Twain):
>
> "When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could
> hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be
> twenty-one, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in
> seven years."
>
>> Putting teenagers out on their own, IMHO, would be the best way of
>> getting them to?learn about the real world, that they don't know
>> everything, and their parents might not be such the blundering
>> idiots that survived only on chance and charity that they thought
>> they were, and might be worth listening to.
>
> Shoving a non-swimming kid into the deep end of a pool is rude, crude,
> uncouth, and perpetuates the ignorance one wishes education to erase.
> Putting unprepared teenagers, without their majority legal rights,
> out into the world is dangerous and risky for kids and parents alike.
>
> Wouldn't it be great if the kids got swimming lessons, and the parents
> got parenting lessons? Adult basic education has a place in society.
>
>> So, I support on their 17th birthday, putting them out on the
>> doorstep with a?sack of clothes, a bag of Idaho grown?potatoes, a
>> condom, and?their Ipod to give them the opportunity to?show the
>> world how dumb it is and how profoundly intellectually advanced and
>> gifted they are.
>
> Instead of supporting the better interests of the children's welfare,
> and better long-term relations among parents and children a few years
> later, what you are supporting is curmudgeonly self-entertainment of
> the sort shown in the editorial cartoon of Dick Cheney, in pajamas
> and bathrobe, sitting in a chair aiming the TV clicker at the set
> during the winter Olympics, yelling "When is the "#@$%&^"
> waterboarding competition?" In other words, torture as entertainment.
>
> If the practice of turning kids loose for a year became widespread,
> don't you suppose that some of those kids who didn't talk with their
> parents might talk with each other? And perhaps find ways to show
> their displeasure at their ill-treatment? How about nocturnal
> guerrilla spud-gun attacks through some well-deserving living room
> windows? Has the Homeland Security Office in your neighborhood
> considered whether alternative parenting strategies might prevent
> tuber terrorists expressing their disappointment at being kicked out
> without so much as a GED to attach to a fast-food job application?
>
>> On their 18th birthday they can return provided they sign a
>> contract not to do drugs, to shut up until they are?23, listen to
>> their parents and obey them, show up for school every day, and
>> study as hard as they can. : )
>
> Donovan, the market for dysfunctional families appears well-supplied
> already, so adding highly unlikely, not to say, fantasy, contractual
> obligations to these situational tragedies is akin to adding empty
> calories to silly-salads of unlikely mixed ingredients.
>
>> Do this and you will get your $60 million worth of education out of
>> them their senior year.
>
> The worth of an education is not measured in a year's performance, but
> rather in a lifetime of achievement.
>
>> Otherwise, they are largely a waste of time and you might as well???
>> pay teachers to educate a brick wall, they are at least better? ???
>> listeners
>
> Believe it or not, Donovan, the important active components in the
> education process exist between students' ears, not just teachers'.
> Amazingly, students can learn in spite of their teachers, though what
> they learn may be debatable. Coordinating the two is desirable.
>
> While more attention to the educational and parental transitioning of
> kids to young adulthood may be needed, kicking kids out of childhood
> homes without appropriate sustaining connections is counterproductive
> to everyone.
>
>
> Ken
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.???
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ???http://www.fsr.net? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???
> ? ? ? ? ? mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100219/6ea2643f/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:20:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2008 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Moscow Sidewalk/Crosswalk Bicycle/Pedestrian
> Accidents & Code
> To: Art Deco <deco at moscow.com>, Ted Moffett <starbliss at gmail.com>
> Cc: Moscow Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Message-ID: <983749.76694.qm at web44706.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Ted,
> ?
> Just?mow their asses over when they step out of their car. Call is carma. 
> J/k :P
> ?
> Your Friend,
> ?
> Donovan Arnold
>
> --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Ted Moffett <starbliss at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Ted Moffett <starbliss at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Vision2020] Moscow Sidewalk/Crosswalk Bicycle/Pedestrian 
> Accidents & Code
> To: "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com>
> Cc: "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 7:07 PM
>
>
>
> I don't know what further charges could be made against the driver of the 
> car who struck these pedestrians in the crosswalk.? But those operating 
> cars and trucks are in effect in control of what can be described as a 
> weapon that can easily kill... The casual often distracted or careless 
> attitude of many drivers as they assume control over the safety and lives 
> of others on highways, streets, sidewalks and crosswalks, is alarming.? 
> The death toll on the highways justifies the alarm.? And given cars and 
> trucks cross sidewalks at "drive-ins," sidewalks are not as safe as some 
> might assume...
> ?
> As is obvious,?the close proximity of those using human powered 
> transportation (which includes those walking) with?cars and trucks in 
> operation on streets and highways, sidewalks and?crosswalks,?is a 
> dangerous situation,?regardless of what laws are in place.? But current 
> laws covering these situations appears seriously flawed.?
> ?
> The Boise City Council, and the Idaho legislature (read info on this 
> here:?http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/2010-February/068600.html?), 
> recently addressed this problem focusing on changes to bicycle related 
> code, inspired in part by the recent deaths of several bicyclists in 
> Idaho.? But I think the law should be crafted broadly to cover what might 
> be termed, "human powered transportation," pedestrians, bicycles, 
> skateboards, roller blades, runners, and so forth.?
> ?
> 1)? All persons using human powered transportation on sidewalks (with 
> drive-ins for vehicles) and crosswalks, and of course bicycles on streets 
> and highways sharing the road with cars and trucks, should be required to 
> carry artificial light (viewable front, back and sides) between sunset and 
> sunrise.? The current Idaho code only indicates bicycles and motor 
> vehicles?should carry artificial light, as far as I have?determined.? But 
> runners, skateboarders, rollerbladers, etc. can sometimes be moving faster 
> than bicycles, while their movement might be more sudden and erratic; and 
> are subject to just as much risk from a collision with a car or truck in 
> crosswalks or on sidewalks with drive-ins..? Why are they not required to 
> carry artificial light at night?? I don't perceive any good reason why 
> they should not be required... If the pedestrians in the recent 
> car/pedestrian accident were carrying light (the accident was at night, it 
> appears, "2104
> hours"), the accident might have been avoided.
>
> 2)? Given the advantages cars and trucks have in speed (even in 25 mph 
> zones cars are often?moving much faster than most all using human powered 
> transportation), mass and lighting capability, over those using human 
> powered transportation, and the odds of serous injuries to those hit while 
> using human powered transportation, it seems reasonable to craft the law 
> to assign extra responsibility to drivers of motor vehicles to take extra 
> "due care" that a crosswalk or sidewalk is not occupied, or in a second or 
> two about to be occupied, by a person using human powered transportation.?
> ?
> I am not saying that the law should always blame the driver of a motor 
> vehicle if they hit someone using human powered transportation in a 
> crosswalk or sidewalk; but cars and trucks have lighting capability that 
> should always at night be able to illuminate a sidewalk or crosswalk to 
> allow seeing someone.? And if the?visibility of the crosswalk or sidewalk 
> is so poor that it is difficult to determine whether these areas are in 
> use, the motor vehicle driver should?assume extra caution when crossing a 
> crosswalk or sidewalk.? Even during daylight, if a driver of a car or 
> truck cannot be sure, due to the view of the whole crosswalk being 
> blocked, for example, by a large truck in an adjacent lane, that a 
> crosswalk or sidewalk is not occupied, the driver should slow or stop till 
> they can be sure the crosswalk is not occupied.
> ?
> The speed of motor vehicles often makes avoiding an impending collision 
> much more difficult for those using human powered transportation, thus the 
> increased responsibility that should be aimed at drivers of cars and 
> trucks to take extra "due care" they are not endangering the public.
> ?
> As to how the code should be written to address these issues, the legal 
> eagles have the expertise...
> ------------------------------------------
> Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett
> ?
> On 2/16/10, Art Deco <deco at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>
> I hope that more serious charges than inattentive driving are brought and 
> vigorously pursued.?
> ?
> How many more of these incidents are going to occur before the MPD and the 
> city attorney decide that traffic law enforcement needs a lot more 
> attention and vigor?
> ?
> Wayne A. Fox
> 1009 Karen Lane
> PO Box 9421
> Moscow, ID? 83843
> ?
> waf at moscow.com
> 208 882-7975
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Stephanie Kalasz
> To: v2020
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:17 AM
> Subject: [Vision2020] MPD Press Release
>
> ?
>
> MOSCOW POLICE DEPARTMENT
> 118 East 4th Street
> Moscow, Idaho 83843
> Tel: 208-882-COPS??? Fax: 208-882-4020
> ?
>
>
> PRESS RELEASE
> ?
> February 15, 2010
> ?
> On Sunday, February 14, 2010, at 2104 hours, Moscow Police, Fire and 
> Volunteer Ambulance Service were dispatched to a traffic accident with 
> injuries at the intersection of Sixth and Asbury Streets. Whitcom dispatch 
> advised three pedestrians were struck by a vehicle at this location. ?
> ?
> Officers observed two women on the north sidewalk in a prone position 
> being attended to by two males upon their arrival.? These women were 
> identified as Rachel Price (W/F 19 years old of Moscow) and Ericka Brown 
> W/F 18 year old of Moscow).? Rachel Price complained of head and elbow 
> injuries.? Ericka Brown complained of lower back and hip injuries.? The 
> male attending to Brown, Ryan Stewart (W/M 18 year old of Pullman) stated 
> he had also been struck but did not require medical attention at this 
> time.
> ?
> Officers determined a Silver 1993 Toyota Camry driven by Travis Hartshorn 
> (W/M 20 years old of Moscow) was driving east on 6th Street.? Hartshorn 
> attempted to turn north (left) on Asbury when he struck the three 
> pedestrians who were walking west in the marked crosswalk along the north 
> side of 6th Street at Asbury.? Brown and Price were stuck by the front of 
> the Toyota as it was turning. Both Brown and Price come into contact with 
> the hood and windshield of the Toyota before being ejected off onto the 
> roadway.? Stewart stated his left leg was clipped by the left front of the 
> Toyota at the same time it struck the two women.
> ?
> Rachel Price and Ericka Brown were transported to Gritman Medical Center 
> by Moscow Volunteer Ambulance.? Travis Hartshorn was cited and released 
> for inattentive driving and failure to provide current proof of liability 
> insurance.
> ?
> Please contact A.C. Duke at 208-310-9254 for additional information.
> ?
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.???
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ???http://www.fsr.net? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???
> ? ? ? ? ? mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100219/9029c9ed/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> End of Vision2020 Digest, Vol 44, Issue 121
> *******************************************