[Vision2020] Hey, Tom's a Republican!

[Donovan Arnold]

I think Rep. Trail is correct on this one. We have no idea what kind of twisted but "well intended" legislation is going to come down from the sausage factory on the Hill. I think it is unconstitutional to require people to buy health insurance from companies that don't cover anything you need and charge more than you can afford.
 
Why not require people to buy new cars every other year that don't have engines regardless of what the auto industries want to charge? It makes about as much sense.
 
People try to argue that you are required to buy auto insurance. But this isn't true, you are required to buy auto insurance only if you choose to drive so you don't infringe on the rights, life, and property of others you may injury while exercising that privilege.   
 
Your Friend,
 
Donovan Arnold
 


--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Ron Force <rforce2003 at yahoo.com> wrote:


From: Ron Force <rforce2003 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Hey, Tom's a Republican!
To: "Wayne Price" <bear at moscow.com>
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Friday, February 12, 2010, 10:24 PM






Why, from your taxes, of course (Idaho Statesman):



Minority Leader John Rusche, D-Lewiston, said the measure is premature and will interfere with well-meaning efforts to cut costs and improve the damaged U.S. health care system.
Others argued the possible cost to taxpayers of $100,000 - for Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden to hire another full-time attorney to pursue litigation against the federal government - would be an irresponsible expenditure during a budget crisis.
"How can we justify spending or maybe spending an additional $100,000 a year when we're cutting parks, schools and necessary services to the most needy residents?" said Rep. Elfrede Higgins, D-Garden City.




From: Wayne Price <bear at moscow.com>
To: Ron Force <rforce2003 at yahoo.com>
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Sent: Fri, February 12, 2010 1:35:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Hey, Tom's a Republican!

An open question on this one: 


WHERE is the 100k coming from to try and defend this one in court?



























On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Ron Force wrote:




(Lewiston Tribune)

 JEERS ... to state Reps. Tom Trail, R-Moscow, Ken Roberts, R-Donnelly, and Paul Shepherd, R-Riggins. They voted the GOP line Tuesday, repudiating President Barack Obama's and the Democratic Congress' attempt to reform health care.

All 52 House Republicans voted for a measure that obligates Idaho to spend at least $100,000 challenging in court any health care reform package Congress passes.

All 18 Democrats - including Reps. Shirley Ringo of Moscow, and John Rusche and Liz Chavez of Lewiston - voted no.

"The Idaho Health Freedom Act is not saying 'no' to health care reform," says Rep. Jim Clark, R-Hayden Lake. "It's the first step toward saying yes."

Come on. When was the last time Idaho lawmakers did anything to help uninsured adults?

Idaho now has 222,600 citizens - most of them working poor - who can't get affordable health insurance.

The Idaho House has just stood up for their rights to remain uninsured. - M.T. 

=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet, 
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
              http://www.fsr.net                       
         mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet, 
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20100213/678c3802/attachment.html