[Vision2020] What a GREAT Government We Have!!!!

[Wayne Price]

LOL!  Right, so you want folks to believe that the 30 REPUBLICANS that  
voted against were influenced by the Whitehouse?

With logic like that I'll bet you're voting for Steed and Weber! LOL











On Oct 21, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Ron Force wrote:

> Tell the Obama Administration (from the Huffington Post):
>
>
>
> "The DoD opposes the proposed amendment," reads a message sent from  
> the administration to the Senate on October 6, the day the amendment  
> passed by a 68-30 vote.
>
> "The Department of Defense, the prime contractor, and higher tier  
> subcontractors may not be in a position to know about such things.  
> Enforcement would be problematic, especially in cases where privity  
> of contract does not exist between parties within the supply chain  
> that supports a contract," reads the DoD note. "It may be more  
> effective to seek a statutory prohibition of all such arrangements  
> in any business transaction entered into within the jurisdiction of  
> the United States, if these arrangements are deemed to pose an  
> unacceptable method of recourse."
>
>
>
> Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/19/defense-department-oppose_n_326569.html
>
> From: Art Deco <deco at moscow.com>
> To: Vision 2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Wed, October 21, 2009 2:39:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] What a GREAT Government We Have!!!!
>
> Corporation:  An ingenious device for obtaining profit without  
> individual responsibility. -- Ambrose Bierce
>
> Not only is this story outraging, but to exempt corporations who are  
> given the business to defend our country and its values from even  
> corporate responsibility, and be defended by the majority of  
> Republicans is an indication of how far that party has sunk from  
> common decency and respect for all Americans, and how little those  
> corporations/politicians charged with protecting our values really  
> believe in those values.
>
> This story needs very wide circulation.  I wonder how Risch or Crapo  
> would feel if it was their wives of daughters who were the victims.   
> With Risch, it might not matter a whit, but I expected a little  
> better from Crapo -- although a mailing I received last week from an  
> insurance lobby praising Crapo apparently sent with his blessing has  
> now cast doubt that he has much integrity left.
>
> W.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wayne Price
> To: vision 2020
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 8:15 PM
> Subject: [Vision2020] What a GREAT Government We Have!!!!
>
> NOTICE Where the Idaho Senators came out on this one!
>
> Rape case to force US defence firms into the open
>
> Senate passes measure prompted by case of woman prevented from suing  
> over alleged rape by Halliburton/KBR colleagues
> guardian.co.uk, Thursday 15 October 2009 16.04 BST
>
>
> Jamie Leigh Jones
>
> Jamie Leigh Jones testifying in Washington in 2007. Photograph: Greg  
> Nash/AP
>
> US defence firms are to be barred from lucrative government  
> contracts if they refuse to allow employees access to the courts,  
> after a woman working for a Halliburton subsidiary in Iraq was  
> prevented from taking legal action over an alleged gang rape by  
> fellow workers.
> Al Franken, the Senate's newest member, has won an amendment to the  
> defence appropriations bill prompted by the case of Jamie Leigh  
> Jones. She alleges that she was drugged and raped by seven American  
> contractors in Baghdad in 2005.
> Jones, who was employed by KBR, which was fighting oil fires, says  
> that a pattern of subsequent behaviour by the firm, including  
> allegedly locking her in a container under armed guard and losing  
> forensic evidence, amounts to a cover-up.
> Halliburton/KBR used a clause in her contract requiring disputes to  
> be settled by arbitration to block legal action – a policy which,  
> her lawyer says, has encouraged assaults by creating a climate of  
> impunity.
> Franken described it as a denial of justice. "Contractors are using  
> fine print to deny women like Jamie Leigh Jones their day in court,"  
> he said in a Senate debate.
> In legal papers Jones, who was 20 at the time, says she was fed a  
> knockout drug while drinking with KBR firefighters.
> "When she awoke the next morning still affected by the drug, she  
> found her body naked and severely bruised, with lacerations to her  
> vagina and anus, blood running down her leg, her breast implants  
> ruptured and her pectoral muscles torn‚ which would later require  
> reconstructive surgery. Upon walking to the rest room, she passed  
> out again," the papers say.
> Jones was treated by a US army doctor who gave forensic evidence to  
> company officials. She says the firm placed her under guard in a  
> shipping container and she was released only after her father asked  
> the US embassy to intervene. When the forensic evidence was handed  
> to investigators two years later, crucial photographs and notes were  
> missing.
>
> Jones says she identified one of the men who attacked her after he  
> confessed, but that Halliburton/KBR prevented her from taking legal  
> action against him or the company by pointing to a clause in her  
> contract requiring disputes to go to arbitration.
> She told a Senate committee: "I had no idea that the clause was part  
> of the contract, what the clause actually meant, or that I would  
> eventually end up in this horrible situation."
> Her lawyer, Todd Kerry, said that by forcing earlier assault cases  
> to arbitration, Halliburton and other defence firms had created a  
> climate in which some workers came to believe they could get away  
> with sexual assaults and other crimes.
> "I've received upwards of 40 calls to my office [about assault  
> cases] in the past two years. A good number had been disposed of  
> under arbitration," he said."Had there been public scrutiny to  
> prevent such things happening and these cases taken to court, they  
> might not have been repeated. Instead one of the men who raped Jamie  
> was so confident that nothing would happen that he was lying in bed  
> next to her the morning after."
> Halliburton and KBR divided into separate companies in April 2007.  
> Halliburton declined to comment on the case.
> KBR has sought to discredit Jones's account by saying she was seen  
> drinking and flirting with a firefighter before leaving the  
> gathering with him, and that the man claims to have had consensual  
> sex with her. The firm denies that Jones was held prisoner, but not  
> that her injuries indicated serious sexual assault.
> But KBR defended arbitration as a "fair process", saying: "Most  
> large companies have a dispute resolution programme which is  
> mandatory and is designed to address employee complaints quickly and  
> efficiently. Under KBR's dispute resolution programme 95% of all  
> employee complaints are resolved quickly to the employees'  
> satisfaction without a mediation or an arbitration."
> Franken and Kerry challenge the claim that arbitration is usually  
> settled to the satisfaction of complainants. Other women have come  
> forward to accuse the firms of not taking assault allegations  
> seriously.
> Mary Beth Kineston, who drove lorries in Iraq and survived a bloody  
> ambush, has alleged that she was sacked after complaining of sexual  
> assaults by several fellow workers.
> "At least if you got in trouble on a convoy, you could radio the  
> army and they would come and help you out. But when I complained to  
> KBR, they didn't do anything. I still have nightmares. They changed  
> my life forever, and they got away with it," she told the New York  
> Times last year.
> Linda Lindsey, who worked for KBR in Iraq for three years, has said  
> that male supervisors regularly offered promotions and other  
> benefits in exchange for sex. Lindsey said she filed complaints but  
> they that were never acted on.Last month Jones won a court ruling  
> against Halliburton and KBR that the arbitration clause in her  
> contract did not prevent them from being sued. But the legal battle  
> to get the case even heard is far from over. "Four years to fight to  
> get in court is not a day in court," she said.
> The legislation to end the bar on legal action passed the Senate  
> with a clear majority but 30 Republican members voted against it,  
> including the former presidential candidate John McCain. Among the  
> objections were claims that the government had no business  
> interfering in a private contract between a company and its workers.
>
>
> The Dirty Thirty and the Silence of the Media Lambs
>
>
> When the U.S. Senate finally stopped Joseph McCarthy’s violent,  
> devastating attacks on American values, 22 Senators SUPPORTED  
> McCarthy. They were all Republicans.
>
>
>
> When a 19-year-old woman was reportedly gang-raped by co-workers in  
> Iraq, 30 Senators* supported the rapists’ company, effectively  
> protecting the RAPISTS along with the company. All Republicans,  
> these Senators self-righteously voted AGAINST an amendment holding  
> government subcontractors responsible for the actions of their  
> employees. “Free enterprise” beat out accountability for a gang-rape.
> What kind of human being, much less Senator, champions private  
> profit over justice in the face of rape? I can only wonder -- would  
> it have been different if a man had been gang-raped?
> When The Daily Show with Jon Stewart reported this week on the  
> debate, then vote on the Senate Floor -- including simply  
> unbelievable speeches from a number of these 30 Republican Senators  
> -- we went looking to other news sources to learn more, quite  
> reasonably turning first to The New York Times. Zero, zip, zilch.
> Alternative media,such as Alternet and the Huffington Post had the  
> story, as did the member-supported MinnPost.com in the hometown of  
> the Senator who had introduced the proposed amendment, Senator Al  
> Franken. A press release was reprinted by HometownSource.com.  
> Coverage was also provided by numerous bloggers and special interest  
> groups. Except for Haliburton’s hometown Houston Chronicle, in the  
> mass/traditional media, we had to go to the U.K.’s Guardian** for  
> more information. Lest one argue that the story “isn’t news”, as of  
> 7 PM Mountain time on Saturday, the story ranked #4 on the Guardian  
> website’s most viewed list. We’re still waiting for the screaming- 
> Fox-News-headline: Republican Senators Support Gang-Rape by Three to  
> One Margin.
> Minnesota Senator Franken served decency well by introducing this  
> piece of proposed legislation. Anyone working for the United States  
> government, even mercenaries working for subcontractors, has the  
> right to expect their fundamental human rights will not be blindly  
> violated, left with no where to turn for justice.
> More, Sen. Franken has served a greater good in letting these  
> Senators’ actions speak for themselves. It is they -- not he -- who  
> are keeping front and center the reality of Republican ideological  
> and dogmatic maliciousness in the service of their corporate masters.
> These 30 Republican Senators may refuse to hold accountable  
> government contractors and those to whom they subcontract. For me,  
> the larger question is -- will voters in the states nominally  
> represented by this Dirty Thirty hold THEM accountable?
> Arbitration for gang-rape? Surely the Republican Party has earned  
> the right to die.
>
> *– These are the Republican senators, all male, who voted against  
> the amendment and for the right of corporations to do pretty much  
> what they d**n well please without suffering any consequences:
> The Dirty Thirty WALL of SHAME:
>
> Alexander (R-TN)
> Barrasso (R-WY)
> Bond (R-MO)
> Brownback (R-KS)
> Bunning (R-KY)
> Burr (R-NC)
> Chambliss (R-GA)
> Coburn (R-OK)
> Cochran (R-MS)
> Corker (R-TN)
> Cornyn (R-TX)
> Crapo (R-ID)
> DeMint (R-SC)
> Ensign (R-NV)
> Enzi (R-WY)
> Graham (R-SC)
> Gregg (R-NH)
> Inhofe (R-OK)
> Isakson (R-GA)
> Johanns (R-NE)
> Kyl (R-AZ)
> McCain (R-AZ)
> McConnell (R-KY)
> Risch (R-ID)
> Roberts (R-KS)
> Sessions (R-AL)
> Shelby (R-AL)
> Thune (R-SD)
> Vitter (R-LA)
> Wicker (R-MS)
>
> These are the Republican senators who voted for the amendment:***
>
> Robert F. Bennett - R-UT
> Susan Collins - R-ME
> Chuck Grassley- R-IA
> Orin Hatch-R-UT
> Kay Bailey Hutchison - R-TX
> George S. LeMieuz - R-FL
> Richard Lugar - R-IN
> Lisa Murkowski - R-AK
> Olympia Snowe - R-ME
> George Voinovich - R-OH
>
> Four of the 10 are women, bless them all.
>
> ***- two Democratic senators, West Virginia’s Byrd and  
> Pennsylvania’s Specter, did not vote.
>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com  
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20091021/98fdd533/attachment-0001.html