[Vision2020] vandals strike again (I fixed it for you Donovan)
Garrett Clevenger
garrettmc at verizon.net
Sun Nov 8 09:39:51 PST 2009
Donovan,
Sure, that could be true.
Then again, when Christians try to force their world view on people who don't believe their fairy tale, that's offensive.
Christian Missionaries destroyed native cultures all over the world. Completely offensive.
Christian soldiers now are fighting a holy war in the mid east, offending to the death.
Christians using their agenda to encourage the Rapture are screwing everybody in the process. (Afterall, why would they care what happens to the planet or the non believers when they'll be saved and we'll be left behind?) Willingly offensive by design.
Christians subvert the First Amendment by using the Bible to justify religious based laws. That's treasonous and completely offensive to our Constitution and the people who lose their rights.
I've seen self-righteous signs on the road by religious people that are offensive. I usually just laugh at their arrogance, not want to deface their property.
It seems the Christians you speak of who are so sensitive of others expressing themselves ought to ask, "What would Jesus do?"
My understanding is that he'd probably turn the other cheek, or use compassionate communication to encourage non-believers, or not even be bothered by such trivialness.
Jesus would probably be most offended by His followers seeming oblivious to the hurt the US has caused to the planet and the billions of other inhabitants His Holy Father created for us to live on, and wonder why you aren't working hard to stop the war machine and truly offensive policies.
If there were a devil, he'd use religion to promote divisive and self righteousness, something religious people seem pretty good at.
But then again, maybe there isn't a devil or a Jesus, just a bunch of bipedal animals who aren't smart enough to see the harm the power they've been given by creation can really cause.
Excuse me for not caring about how Christians may be offended by a benign sign. That seems a little silly to me in context of the hurt some Christians cause, willingly or blindly.
Take care,
Garrett Clevenger
________________________________
From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2008 at yahoo.com>
To: vision2020 at moscow.com; Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at verizon.net>
Sent: Sun, November 8, 2009 12:05:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] vandals strike again (I fixed it for you Donovan)
Garrett,
How is drawing a picture of a God offensive? It is.
Christians don't believe anything is good without God. It cannot be. It is contrary to its definition. It is saying all squares are round. It is an insult to their faith to say that.
Insulting people's faith and personal value system is going to elicit a negative reaction.
Your Friend,
Donovan Arnold
--- On Sun, 11/8/09, Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at verizon.net> wrote:
>From: Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at verizon.net>
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] vandals strike again (I fixed it for you Donovan)
>To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2008 at yahoo.com>, vision2020 at moscow.com
>Date: Sunday, November 8, 2009, 7:34 AM
>
>
> >
>How is "millions are good without God" negative or offensive?
>
>
>I suppose if it said something like, "millions wish God {or Christians} would go to Hell" then yeah, I could see you point.
>
>
>The slogan in question is benign.
>
>
> Garrett Clevenger
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2008 at yahoo.com>
>To: Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at verizon.net>; vision2020 at moscow.com; deb <debismith at moscow.com>
>Sent: Sat, November 7, 2009 11:18:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] vandals strike again (I fixed it for you Donovan)
>
>
>Debi,
>
>Is there nothing on a billboard that could be so offensive to you that you would want to see it vandalized or removed? I find that hard to imagine.
>
>I can think of lots of things that could be on a billboard to make me want to take it down. If God is important to someone, which He is, it is going to be offensive, and people don't want to be forced to look at highly offensive things every day.
>
>I'm not saying I would advocate this method of removing the billboard, because I don't. But when they have a huge audience of people and they say something negative and offensive some of them are going to react in a bad way. It is inevitable.
>
>Donovan Arnold
>
>--- On Sun, 11/8/09, deb <debismith at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>
>>From: deb <debismith at moscow.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] vandals strike again (I fixed it for you Donovan)
>>To: "Garrett Clevenger" <garrettmc at verizon.net>, vision2020 at moscow.com
>>Date: Sunday, November 8, 2009, 1:45 AM
>>
>>
>> >>
>>I just don't understand how anyone with faith in their religion would be so threatened by a billboard that he or she would deface said billboard. Of course, I don't understand how someone else's relationship (straight or gay) would threaten my marriage. All I can think is the "faith" expressed is pretty puny if it can't stand the stress of such external goings on...Methinks they do protest too much? Faith that easily shaken is no faith at all.
>>Just sayin'
>>Debi R-S
>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: Garrett Clevenger
>>>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 10:25 AM
>>>Subject: [Vision2020] vandals strike again (I fixed it for you Donovan)
>>>
>>>
>>>Mike said what I would have said. I would only change "Christians" to say "religious fanatics."
>>>
>>>
>>>It's intersting that some justify the vandalism because they were offended and threatened by the billboard. An an analogy would be justifying James killing of Tyler because James felt threatened by him. James edited that threat like the vandals edited the words, only a billboard is less threatening than a jealous man. Obviously a dead man is a way worse outcome than a vandalized billboard.
>>>
>>>
>>>Both are crimes that should be put in the proper context and should have the proper punishment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Mike writes:
>>>
>>> "This makes at least as much sense.
>>>
>>> Donovan,
>>>
>>> I agree that there are a great number of Christians that are not out to do harm, and just want to be left alone and want to leave atheists alone... Unfortunately, that is not the case for most Christians.
>>>
>>> Many Christians ridicule atheists. Attack them as people. Make fun of their lack of belief in God as equivocal to that of children believing in the Easter Bunny. But also want to bring real harm by the elimination and change of US Culture to insert God and replace the Constitution with the Bible as the head of all authority. They want to tax, and consequently, shut down anyone that disagrees with them.
>>>
>>> Christianity not only brings a cultural breakdown of basic American Values and Traditions, but at its very core promotes the principles of insanity.
>>>
>>> Many Atheists want the 20+% of the people that don't believe in God to bow down to them, and say "Merry Christmas", "God Bless you", or "One Nation Under God".
>>>
>>> They don't care that 20+% of Americans are offended that God is forced into their daily lives. Nobody is barring Christians from church, or to be buried in a cemetary, or to celebrate Christmas. But they want all of it to be mandated into any public area to accomodate their personal belief system..
>>>
>>> Understand, whenever people preach God, there will ALWAYS be oppostion. It is our freedom and right to be free from God in everything we do. Many Christians piss people off because they don't think of them as people that want to be free from their beliefs but are hostile people instead, that are out to stop us from celebrating ours.
>>>
>>> Happy Holidays,
>>>
>>> Mike Deleve"
>>>
>>> Garrett Clevenger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
________________________________
>>>=======================================================
>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>> http://www.fsr.net/
>>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>>=======================================================
>>>
>>>
________________________________
>>>
>>>Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>Version: 8.5.408 / Virus Database: 270.13.112/2391 - Release Date: 09/23/09 18:00:00
>>>
>>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>
>>=======================================================
>>List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>> http://www.fsr.net
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>>=======================================================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20091108/cd57461b/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list