[Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)

Kai Eiselein editor at lataheagle.com
Wed Mar 18 16:22:02 PDT 2009


And those muskets were the "assault weapons" of their day.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: kerry becker 
  To: editor at lataheagle.com ; sslund_2007 at verizon.net ; sunilramalingam at hotmail.com 
  Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 3:48 PM
  Subject: RE: [Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)


  Yes but wasn't this right created during a time where arms meant muskets not machine guns?
   
  Just sayin.. 
   

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: editor at lataheagle.com
  To: sslund_2007 at verizon.net; sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
  Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:43:04 -0700
  CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
  Subject: Re: [Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)


  Simple.
  Driving is a privelege.
  Ownership of firearms is a right.
  I really don't get what part of that people don't "get".
  We have law upon law upon law controlling gun ownership, yet idiots who think everyone with a gun is a threat keep passing more and more restrictive laws.
  Thumbprints? Notification of change of address? A photo kept on file?
  Why does this bring to mind the sexual offender registry? Don't sexual offenders have a number of similar regulations?
  At least they got a trial.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Saundra Lund 
    To: 'Kai Eiselein' ; 'Sunil Ramalingam' 
    Cc: 'vision 2020' 
    Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:20 AM
    Subject: RE: [Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)


    Kai wrote:

    “We are headed into brave new world... just like Nazi Germany, Communist Russia and any number of other totalitarian states.”



    Didn’t we already get there when the same started being required for things like driver’s licenses???  While I’m not up on what your concerns might be with this particular piece of legislation, can you explain why you think the licensing of firearms should be easier than getting a driver’s license?



    Besides, after the huge erosions of the previous eight years under King George, forgive me if I can’t get too worked up about what seem to be to be common sense changes to the licensing of firearms.  Personally, I think gun advocates do themselves a huge disservice and make the issue far more divisive than it needs to be by fighting against common sense changes designed to stop the huge trafficking in illegal firearms.



    For those interested in reading the full text, here’s a link I hope works:

    http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text



    Also, why are you so much more concerned about a bill that’s highly unlikely to pass (IMHO – there are no co-sponsors) than you are about legislation that can have very real detrimental effects on health care in Idaho and weasle religious beliefs and conscience into the free market to interfer with the doctor-patient relationship?





    Saundra Lund

    Moscow, ID



    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.

    ~ Edmund Burke



    ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2009 through life plus 70 years, Saundra Lund.  Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the author.*****



    From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Kai Eiselein
    Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:05 AM
    To: Sunil Ramalingam
    Cc: vision 2020
    Subject: Re: [Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)



    I'm refering to H.R.45 AKA: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009

    Which will require gun purchasers to be licensed, photographed, fingerprinted and notify the government of address changes.

    We are headed into brave new world... just like Nazi Germany, Communist Russia and any number of other totalitarian states.

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: Sunil Ramalingam 

      Cc: vision 2020 

      Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:44 AM

      Subject: Re: [Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)



      Kai,

      I came up with a blank page when I followed your link.  What are you focusing on here?

      Sunil

      > From: editor at lataheagle.com
      > To: philosopher.joe at gmail.com; thansen at moscow.com
      > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:42:02 -0700
      > CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
      > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)
      > 
      > Frankly, I'm more worried about this bill in Congress:
      > http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45.IH:
      > 
      > Just one more step on the road to a totalitarian state.
      > 
      > ----- Original Message ----- 
      > From: "Joe Campbell" <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>
      > To: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
      > Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
      > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:20 AM
      > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] House Bill 216 (Pharmacist Conscience Bill)
      > 
      > 
      > >A better bill would allow McDonald's workers to refuse to serve those
      > > who are overweight. I'd love the right to refuse to read papers using
      > > bad arguments.
      > >
      > > Joe Campbell
      > >
      > > On Mar 18, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
      > >
      > >> Courtesy of the Spokesman Review's blog site.
      > >>
      > >> ---------------------------------------------
      > >>
      > >> Pharmacist conscience bill heads for amendment
      > >> at 8:04 a.m. on March 18
      > >>
      > >> Rep. Tom Loertscher’s bill to give pharmacists or “any person”
      > >> the right
      > >> to refuse to fill a prescription for a patient on the basis of
      > >> conscience
      > >> is headed for the House’s amending order, to revise the bill so it a
      > >> pplies
      > >> only to pharmacists - not to cashiers, stores, or others. Rep. Lynn
      > >> Luker,
      > >> R-Boise, proposed the amendments. “It’s simply a matter of burden
      > >> of
      > >> proof,” he said. “I don’t think it will change in any way the
      > >> current
      > >> practices, because people do have that right.” Emotional testimony o
      > >> n the
      > >> bill stretched for two days before it was approved for amendment on
      > >> a 14-4
      > >> vote. The testimony included pharmacists and other experts who said
      > >> Idaho
      > >> pharmacists already have the right to refuse to fill a prescription;
      > >> Idaho
      > >> has no law requiring them to fill all prescriptions. Among those who
      > >> testified was pharmacist Gloria Hansen, who said, “I do know that we
      > >> need
      > >> to act according to our conscience. .. I lean on the rock which is the
      > >> lord God.”
      > >>
      > >> ---------------------------------------------
      > >>
      > >> It is truly a sad day in Idaho for those citizens whose ethics,
      > >> morals,
      > >> and religious beliefs differ from those of their pharmacist.
      > >>
      > >> Query: If an asthmatic, living in extremely rural Idaho, dependent on
      > >> inhalers for survival, is refused access to such much-needed
      > >> inhalers, by
      > >> his/her pharmacist, because (s)he is gay or his/her
      > >> ethics/morals/religious beliefs differ from his/her pharmacist's
      > >> ethics/morals/religious beliefs . . . and the asthmatic dies as a
      > >> result . . . is the pharmacist guilty of ANYTHING?
      > >>
      > >> Seeya round town, Moscow.
      > >>
      > >> Tom Hansen
      > >> Moscow, Idaho
      > >>
      > >> Join us at The First Annual Intolerista Wingding, April 17th,
      > >> featuring
      > >> Roy Zimmerman and Jeanne McHale. For details go to . . .
      > >>
      > >> http://www.MoscowCares.com/Wingding
      > >>
      > >> Seeya
      > >> there.
      > >>
      > >> ---------------------------------------------
      > >> This message was sent by First Step Internet.
      > >> http://www.fsr.com/
      > >>
      > >>
      > >> =======================================================
      > >> List services made available by First Step Internet,
      > >> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
      > >> http://www.fsr.net
      > >> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
      > >> =======================================================
      > >
      > > =======================================================
      > > List services made available by First Step Internet,
      > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
      > > http://www.fsr.net
      > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
      > > =======================================================
      > >
      > > 
      > 
      > =======================================================
      > List services made available by First Step Internet, 
      > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
      > http://www.fsr.net 
      > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
      > =======================================================


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      =======================================================
       List services made available by First Step Internet, 
       serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                     http://www.fsr.net                       
                mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
      =======================================================



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Find out more. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090318/56196c8a/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list