[Vision2020] ABC

g. crabtree jampot at roadrunner.com
Wed Jun 24 05:47:06 PDT 2009


I'm surprised that it took you so long to come up with such a weak example. Television networks (all of them, not just FOX) have done abbreviated bio/day in  the life pieces with presidents and administration figures for ages. The bit that's new is for one network to be anointed the exclusive co-presenter/cheerleader for administration policy, excluding other points of view that don't mesh with the awesomeness that is his eminences grand plan. A free two hour infomercial with no opposing view points and no one to ask even a single pointed or probing question is unprecedented.


g
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Andreas Schou 
  To: g. crabtree 
  Cc: Joe Campbell ; Mo Hendrickson ; vision2020 at moscow.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:51 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vision2020] ABC


  Gary --

  Well, let's see. Since 2006? 

  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,193995,00.html

  That's just a cursory google. I'm sure I can find more.

  -- ACS


  On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:08 PM, g. crabtree <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:

    The question that leaps to mind for me is since when does the president grant exclusive access to only one network on the condition of it being a beauty piece for the administration. It would be one thing if BHO were simply going to stand up and present his plan but it is my understanding that this isn't the way it will be. It will be the plan along with barrels full of spin. Allowing an alternate point of view to be heard or at a minimum at least allow a few pointed and unscripted questions to be asked. Had W only allowed FOX and Sean Hannity to present policy during his terms in office the howling would have been deafening.

    g
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Joe Campbell 
      To: Mo Hendrickson 
      Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com> 
      Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:31 AM
      Subject: Re: [Vision2020] ABC


      I don't think every event needs to be fair and ballanced (though I agree with Mo that this seems relatively f&b). He is the president; he was elected by a majority of the people. He has a right to state his case on this matter to the people in something other than the context of a full fledged debate. There is plenty of time for debate. Were I ABC, or Fox for that matter, I would want to show the event, no matter who the president was. It has more to do with ratings -- having an exclusive event with the president -- than bias.

      Joe Campbell

      On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Mo Hendrickson <hend5953 at vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:


        Just so we can all have the correct information.  Here is the link to the ABC News information.  

        http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/06/white-house-to-host-primetime-televised-conversation-june-24.html 

        http://tinyurl.com/m5arwz

        It is not on Saturday, it is Wednesday.  It is hosted by Diane Sawyer and Charlie Gibson on a special edition of Primetime.  This is a moderated event, people can submit their questions to ABC and the President will answer them.  From the five minute read that I took, it seems like this will be more fair and balanced than anything I have EVER seen on FoxNews.  (I was not always a left leaning Democrat, so I have watched Fox from a right leaning position, and found most of it too bitter and nasty even then.)  Granted there maybe something on Saturday, but I did not find any such information on the ABC website, it didn't take too long to find the correct information.  

        -Mo 

        > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:41:47 -0700
        > From: lfalen at turbonet.com
        > To: vision2020 at moscow.com
        > Subject: [Vision2020] ABC
        > 
        > According to Sean Hannity, Lars Larsen and Matt Drudge ABC will host a program on healthcare from the Whitehouse this Saturday. This will be a presentation of Obama's plan. No one else will be allowed to present an alternative plan. ABC and or the White house will select the audience.
        > Questions
        > 1. Do they have their facts right?
        > 2. If they do will it be paid for for the Democrats, since it would be an infocommercial? If it is for free then the Republicans and AARP should be allowed to present their plans.
        > Roger
        > 
        > =======================================================
        > List services made available by First Step Internet, 
        > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
        > http://www.fsr.net 
        > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
        > =======================================================

        =======================================================
        List services made available by First Step Internet, 
        serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                      http://www.fsr.net                       
                 mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
        =======================================================


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      =======================================================
       List services made available by First Step Internet, 
       serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                     http://www.fsr.net                       
                mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
      =======================================================

    =======================================================
     List services made available by First Step Internet,
     serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                  http://www.fsr.net
             mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
    =======================================================


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090624/744e13b2/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list