[Vision2020] Big Brother Strikes

Tue Jul 21 13:22:30 PDT 2009

Well Sandra, it appears to me that this particular council is more  
than willing to kow-tow to OUTSIDE interests, be they trying to peddle  
H2O to out of state developers, bend over for Mexican manufactures,   
or the folks from Meridian that were so much in favor of banning  
smoking here!  Notice that Meridian doesn't have a smoking ban? When  
the city council ignores the folks that put them in office it's time  
to look for another "public service for them to get engaged in,  
because I can assure you that  I among many will NOT vote for any of  
the "gang of 7" when elections are held.

Now, what's next? How about a local ordnance that  requires motor  
cycle helmets? As you all know, because people choose not to wear  
helmets, when they get into accidents, all of our insurance goes up,  
and it's a PUBLIC HEALTH issue, not  a "choice" issue!

You don't really think that banning smoking in bars, private clubs and  
20 feet from a door will cause a loss of business do you? *S*

Besides with all the non-smokes flocking to the bars won't that make  
up for it? (I don't think so either!)

I had a gut feeling that this was a put up deal from the begining,  
otherwise it's one hell of a coincidence that the night it was  
originally brought up by our esteemed "Mexican Manufacturing Baron"  
that BEFORE he even brought it up, our city attorney had passed out  
the draft ordnance (THAT WAS DEFEATED) from Eagle Idaho? I wonder what  
kind of "public health" issues he brings up to the city council  down  
in Mexico where is empire is based?  The "fix" was in from the  
begining, we just have to prove it and take the appropriate actions.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Saundra Lund wrote:

> Hi Wayne,
>
> I feel your pain -- really, I do!  I'm looking forward to Tom  
> getting the
> video up so I can see just how disgusting the "process" was.
>
> However, call me jaded, but the writing was on the wall from the  
> first time
> the topic was brought up, which is why I didn't bother to attend  
> last night.
> Thank you for going, though, and for providing us with the details  
> of the
> further erosion of business, choice, and liberty in Moscow  :-(
>
> Many of us have seen a real change in City Government since the GMA  
> Hawkins
> Five constituted on the Council, and it's not been a change for the  
> better,
> I'm sorry to say.  Did you follow the Great Water Give-Away Across  
> State
> Lines or the noise ordinance?  And more recently, did you follow how  
> the
> parking from Sixth Street was removed?  If so, I need say no more:   
> never
> has it been clearer that local government ***isn't*** listening to its
> citizens.  In Moscow, it all depends on who you know rather than  
> decisions
> being made on the basis of any esoteric (certain council members are
> encouraged to use their dictionaries!) notions such as liberty or  
> justice or
> fairness.  Indeed, there's plenty of blame to go around with this
> "decision," unless the proceedings tonight were remarkably different  
> than
> what we saw previously.
>
> The whole thing stinks.
>
> In any case, if anyone cares to organize a Smoke-In to protest,  
> count me in
> on attending:  while I knew it was pointless to show up at the  
> committee or
> council meetings, I'm happy to participate in an organized protest  
> once the
> students get back.  This should be a much easier protest to pull off  
> than
> one where women needed to bare their breasts to protest the  
> unconstitutional
> nudity ordinance back in 2002  :-)
>
> You know, it's absolutely mind-boggling to me that the full council  
> & mayor
> supported this while come winter, we'll still be dealing with the  
> HUGE truly
> public safety problem of unshoveled walks and dangerously narrow  
> streets
> from cars being left in place for days & weeks at a time.  They have  
> the
> microscopic cajones to tell private business owners that they can't  
> allow
> lawful activity on their private property, but they clearly lack the  
> real
> stones to deal with what's rightly their prevue:  public safety on  
> public
> streets, sidewalks, and right-of-ways.
>
> It really doesn't say much for them as a group when they are gung-ho  
> to
> meddle in affairs that really aren't theirs to meddle in while  
> continuing to
> ignore the legitimate issues they've got on their plates.
>
> Barring a successful revolt <g>, I can only hope that our local
> establishments don't experience the loss in business other areas  
> with these
> kinds of bans have experienced . . . and that if they do, they don't  
> take it
> out on consumers by raising prices to preserve profit as is commonly  
> done in
> these situations.  OTOH, raising alcohol prices would be perceived  
> by many
> as a social positive since drinking is bad for people and for  
> society as
> well  :-)
>
> However, the bottom line is, I think, that folks who patronize bars  
> should
> be prepared to pay more for their alcohol in light of the smoking  
> bans while
> businesses in economic self-defense raise prices to make up for lost
> business.
>
> Perhaps folks should start hitting up Bill Parks and our individual  
> City
> Council members for free drinks when they are spotted in drinking
> establishments???  Let's all encourage them to put their money where  
> their
> votes were  :-)
>
> And, if any local establishments do wind up going out of business, I  
> hope
> they put big signs on the building exteriors highlighting this  
> nonsense as
> the cause.
>
>
> JMHO,
> Saundra Lund
> Moscow, ID
>
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people  
> to do
> nothing.
> ~ Edmund Burke
>
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2009 through  
> life plus
> 70 years, Saundra Lund.  Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce  
> outside
> the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
> author.*****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com 
> ]
> On Behalf Of Wayne Price
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 9:52 PM
> To: vision2020
> Subject: [Vision2020] Big Brother Strikes
>
> Well, we got the kind of government we deserve based on the ram-
> rodding thru of the non-smoking  law passed tonight by the council.
> Lets start now and remember this in NOVEMBER.
> REMEMBER that the current council said it will NOT effect business!
>
>
> No smoking within 20 feet of a door way of anyplace where smoking is
> banned, so effectively the seating areas of Mikey's, One World,  and
> Nectar among others, is now a non smoking area  that will according to
> the council be enforced by the Moscow City Police Department. This
> also effectively closes the smoking room at Buccers. And the idea of
> an indoor area, designated for smoking was also removed prior to the
> final vote.  They did throw out one bone, IF there is a patio area
> that fits Big Brothers ruling, it can have a roof, just no walls and
> has to be non-accessible from outside!
>
> Think about this one this coming winter: Smoker, who can't smoke in a
> bar, decides to go out to his/her car and starts the engine to keep
> warm and have a cigarette, God help you if you're over the limit,
> because now big brother can get you for DUI!
>
> Think about WHERE on the sidewalks in downtown Moscow there is 20 feet
> on a side walk  not effected by Big Brother
>
> Also to "level" the playing field, PRIVATE clubs are included in the
> ban.
>
> What a great place Amerika is!
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090721/1bbc127d/attachment-0001.html 