[Vision2020] Project Censored: US Operatives Tortured Detainees to Death in Afghanistan and Iraq

[lfalen]

These charges should be investigated by a Warren type commission. I would not take the  ACLU's word for anything, with out collaboration. Amnesty International would be some what more reliable, but it still needs to be collaborated by an independent panel.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: Ted Moffett starbliss at gmail.com
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:39:46 -0700
To: vision 2020 vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: [Vision2020] Project Censored: US Operatives Tortured Detainees to Death in Afghanistan and Iraq

> The discussion with those who refuse to admit facts regarding this
> issue appears pointless and redundant, but perhaps there is educational or
> entertainment value for some in the attempt to convince a brick wall(s) to
> admit the truth:
> 
> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/7-us-operatives-torture-detainees-to-death-in-afghanistan-and-iraq/
> 
> Sources:
> 
> American Civil Liberties Website, October 24, 2005
> Title: “US Operatives Killed Detainees During Interrogations in Afghanistan
> and Iraq”
> 
> Tom Dispatch.com, March 5, 2006
> Title: “Tracing the Trail of Torture: Embedding Torture as Policy from
> Guantanamo to Iraq”
> Author: Dahr Jamail
> 
> Faculty Evaluator: Rabi Michael Robinson
> Student Researchers: Michael B Januleski Jr. and Jessica Rodas
> 
> The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) released documents of forty-four
> autopsies held in Afghanistan and Iraq October 25, 2005. Twenty-one of those
> deaths were listed as homicides. The documents show that detainees died
> during and after interrogations by Navy SEALs, Military Intelligence, and
> Other Government Agency (OGA).
> 
> “These documents present irrefutable evidence that U.S. operatives tortured
> detainees to death during interrogation,” said Amrit Singh, an attorney with
> the ACLU. “The public has a right to know who authorized the use of torture
> techniques and why these deaths have been covered up.”
> 
> The Department of Defense released the autopsy reports in response to a
> Freedom of Information Act request filed by the ACLU, the Center for
> Constitutional Rights, Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common
> Sense, and Veterans for Peace.
> 
> One of forty-four U.S. military autopsy reports reads as follows: “Final
> Autopsy Report: DOD 003164, (Detainee) Died as a result of asphyxia (lack of
> oxygen to the brain) due to strangulation as evidenced by the recently
> fractured hyoid bone in the neck and soft tissue hemorrhage extending
> downward to the level of the right thyroid cartilage. Autopsy revealed bone
> fracture, rib fractures, contusions in mid abdomen, back and buttocks
> extending to the left flank, abrasions, lateral buttocks. Contusions, back
> of legs and knees; abrasions on knees, left fingers and encircling to left
> wrist. Lacerations and superficial cuts, right 4th and 5th fingers. Also,
> blunt force injuries, predominately recent contusions (bruises) on the torso
> and lower extremities. Abrasions on left wrist are consistent with use of
> restraints. No evidence of defense injuries or natural disease. Manner of
> death is homicide. Whitehorse Detainment Facility, Nasiriyah, Iraq.”
> 
> Another report from the ACLU indicates: “a 27-year-old Iraqi male died while
> being interrogated by Navy Seals on April 5, 2004, in Mosul, Iraq. During
> his confinement he was hooded, flex-cuffed, sleep deprived and subjected to
> hot and cold environmental conditions, including the use of cold water on
> his body and head. The exact cause of death was ‘undetermined’ although the
> autopsy stated that hypothermia may have contributed to his death.”
> 
> An overwhelming majority of the so-called “natural deaths” covered in the
> autopsies were attributed to “arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease”
> (heart attack). Persons under extreme stress and pain may have heart attacks
> as a result of the circumstances of their detainments.
> 
> The Associated Press carried the story of the ACLU charges on their wire
> service. However, a thorough check of LexisNexis and ProQuest electronic
> data bases, using the keywords ACLU and autopsy, showed that at least 95
> percent of the daily papers in the U.S. did not bother to pick up the story.
> The Los Angeles Times covered the story on page A4 with a 635-word report
> headlined “Autopsies Support Abuse Allegations.” Fewer than a dozen other
> daily newspapers including: Bangor Daily News, Maine, page 8;
> Telegraph-Herald, Dubuque, Iowa, page 6; Charleston Gazette, page 5;
> Advocate, Baton Rouge, page 11; and a half dozen others actually covered the
> story. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Seattle Times buried the story
> inside general Iraq news articles. USA Today posted the story on their
> website. MSNBC posted the story to their website, but apparently did not
> consider it newsworthy enough to air on television.
> 
> Janis Karpinski, U.S. Brigadier General Commander of the 800th Military
> Police Brigade, was in charge of seventeen prison facilities in Iraq during
> the Abu Ghraib scandal in 2003. Karpinski testified January 21, 2006 in New
> York City at the International Commission of Inquiry on Crimes against
> Humanity Committed by the Bush administration. Karpinski stated: “General
> [Ricardo] Sanchez [commander of coalition ground forces in Iraq] signed the
> eight-page memorandum authorizing a laundry list of harsh techniques in
> interrogations to include specific use of dogs and muzzled dogs with his
> specific permission.” Karpinski went on to claim that Major General Geoffrey
> Miller, who had been “specifically selected by the Secretary of Defense to
> go to Guantanamo Bay and run the interrogations operations,” was dispatched
> to Iraq by the Bush administration to “work with the military intelligence
> personnel to teach them new and improved interrogation techniques.” When
> asked how far up the chain of command responsibility for the torture orders
> for Abu Ghraib went, Karpinski said, “The Secretary of Defense would not
> have authorized without the approval of the Vice President.”
> 
> UPDATE BY DAHR JAMAIL
> 
> This story, published in March 2006, was merely a snapshot of the ongoing
> and worsening policy of the Bush administration regarding torture. And not
> just time, but places show snapshots of the criminal policy of the current
> administration—Iraq, like Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, Bagram Air Force Base in
> Afghanistan, and other “secret” U.S. military detention centers in Eastern
> European countries are physical examples of an ongoing policy which breaches
> both international law and our very constitution.
> 
> But breaking international and domestic law has not been a concern of an
> administration led by a “president” who has claimed “authority” to disobey
> over 750 laws passed by Congress. In fact, when this same individual does
> things like signing a secret order in 2002 which authorized the National
> Security Agency to violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by
> wiretapping the phones of U.S. citizens, and then goes on to allow the
> secret collection of the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans,
> torture is but one portion of this corrupted picture. This is a critical
> ongoing story, not just because it violates international and domestic law,
> but this state-sanctioned brutality, bankrupt of any morality and decency,
> is already coming back home to haunt Americans. When U.S. soldiers are
> captured in Iraq or another foreign country, what basis does the U.S. have
> now to ask for their fair and humane treatment? And with police brutality
> and draconian “security” measures becoming more real within the U.S. with
> each passing day, why wouldn’t these policies be visited upon U.S. citizens?
> 
> 
> While torture is occasionally glimpsed by mainstream media outlets such as
> the Washington Post and Time Magazine, we must continue to rely on groups
> like the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York City, Human Rights
> Watch, and Amnesty International who cover the subject thoroughly,
> persistently, and unlike (of course) any corporate media outlets.
> Since I wrote this story, there continues to be a deluge of information and
> proof of the Bush administration continuing and even widening their policy
> of torture, as well as their rendering prisoners to countries which have
> torturing human beings down to a science.
> 
> All of this, despite the fact that U.S. laws prohibit torture absolutely,
> clearly stating that torture is never, ever permitted, even in a time of
> war.
> 
> To stay current on this critical topic, please visit the following websites
> regularly:
> http://www.amnesty.org/
> http://www.hrw.org/
> http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/home.asp
> 
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett
> 
>