[Vision2020] [Bulk] Re: Curious

[Paul Rumelhart]

Ok, with most of those I can see your point.  But in today's world of 
high oil prices, dependence upon foreign oil, and the possible threat of 
global warming, why would you consider "a bill to increase the fuel 
economy standards of passenger cars" not to be meaningful legislation?  
What about the bill classifying children's products containing lead to 
be banned as hazardous substances?  Couldn't that somehow be considered 
meaningful?  You know, if you're one of those weirdos that likes kids to 
be healthy or something?

I don't think that God is "punishing" us for GW Bush.  I think GW Bush 
is punishing us for our stupidity and our gullibility these last eight 
years.

Paul

P.S.  Part of me suspects you're actually an accomplished troll.  If so, 
my hat's off to you - a job well done.


Glenn Schwaller wrote:
> Well shoot, considering the amount of time he's served in the Senate 
> (work days - less than half a year), amount of time served in the 
> military (zero), the amount of *meaningful* legislation he has 
> sponsored (I will NOT count resolutions "designating "National Summer 
> Learning Day", "supporting the goals and ideals of Sickle Cell Disease 
> Awareness Month", "celebrating the life of Bishop Gilbert Earl 
> Patterson", a bill to establish a VA Hospital report card, a bill to 
> increase the fuel economy standards of passenger cars, A bill to 
> direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to classify certain 
> children's products containing lead to be banned hazardous substances 
> etc etc etc - so Zero meaningful legislation), and the fact he 
> couldn't get the security clearance needed to provide protection for 
> himself, it looks to me like any one of the Republican women listed 
> are better qualified than Obama.
>
> And God is "punishing" us for GW Bush?  Are you $%&#@ serious?!?!!?
>
> GS
>
>
>