[Vision2020] McCain's Choice Bad for Voters

[Donovan Arnold]

Andreas,
 
I don't know how you would know the date of conception. I don't think Palin's have a history of telling the truth if that is your only source for the exact week of conception.
 
If you took a few minutes to look at photos of Sarah during the preceding 8 months before Trig's birth, and pictures of Bristol during the same time period, it would be difficult to conclude that Sarah is pregnant and Bristol wasn't.
 
Women tend to gain weight during pregnancy, especially on their third, fourth and fifth. Sarah doesn't have any visible signs of pregnancy, while Bristol does. 
 
 
Best Regards,
 
Donovan

--- On Sun, 9/7/08, Andreas Schou <ophite at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Andreas Schou <ophite at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] McCain's Choice Bad for Voters
To: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Date: Sunday, September 7, 2008, 9:09 PM

> I think it is obvious to anyone that looks at the physical activities,
> photos, timing of Trig's birth, that she is not the mother.

I think it's obvious from the fact that Bristol Palin is
five-and-a-fraction months pregnant that she wasn't pregnant with
another child four and a half months ago.

-- ACS

=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080908/9c9f5de2/attachment.html