[Vision2020] Barack Obama supporters call Sarah Palin a “C#*t.”

[No Weatherman]

Chas:

You do not understand that radical Islam wants you dead and you do not
understand how committed they are to their cause.

They do not care about your laissez faire attitude. The do not care
that you believe live and let live.

They want you dead and they're willing to hijack jumbo jets and crash
them into buildings to prove their point.

Gov. Sarah Palin understands this.



On 10/12/08, Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 18:23, keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com> wrote:
>
>  > To call a woman a "c---" is disgusting.
>
>
> I was all set to agree with you, Keely, until I read these charming
>  words from Palin's mouth:
>
>  "Help me, Ohio, to help put John McCain in the White House.  He
>  understands. He understands you. We understand how important it is
>  that this team be elected. For one thing, we know who the bad guys
>  are, OK?"
>
>  And then, the icing:
>
>  "We know that in the war, it's terrorists, terrorists who hate America
>  and her allies and would seek to destroy us, and the bad guys are
>  those who would support and sympathize with the terrorists.  They do
>  not like America because of what we stand for. Liberty. Freedom. Equal
>  rights. Those who sympathize and support those terrorists who would
>  seek to destroy all that it is that we value, those are the bad guys,
>  OK?"
>
>  I'd say that any epithet in the English language pretty accurately
>  describes a women who could spout something so vile.
>
>  I'm going to go out on a limb here and call Palin a Christian
>  Terrorist.  She knows the words she utters will be used by others to
>  condone violence -- that they actually encourage violence -- and I
>  rather think she intends it, unless she really is as stupid as she
>  appears.  She is speaking directly to the nutcase Right, focusing in
>  them, all to achieve her political objectives, under the guise of a
>  hockey-mom, a civilian non-combatant.  In her prayers, she probably
>  justifies it in the name of Jesus.
>