[Vision2020] [OFF LIST] Natural Born Citizen: Evasion You Can Believe In

[Tom Hansen]

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898): A person born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. to non-citizens who "are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity" is automatically a citizen. Tom

> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:33:59 -0700> From: ophite at gmail.com> To: no.weatherman at gmail.com> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Natural Born Citizen: Evasion You Can Believe In> > NW --> > My post must have gotten cut off, because you didn't answer this part:> > Loud assertions aren't an argument. How does Obama's citizenship> status differ from our Presidents' up to Andrew Jackson?> > Could you do that, please?> > -- ACS> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:22 AM, No Weatherman <no.weatherman at gmail.com> wrote:> > ACS:> >> > I'm pretty familiar with basic lawyering, thank you. That's why I> > wrote "good lawyering, bad politics." I'm also familiar with Berg's> > nutjob 9-11 vandal theory (they were vandals, correct?) And anyone can> > go back and trace the NBC status of our presidents, as you have> > apparently done to your credit. That's why I asked you to please "tell> > us why you believe the fathers inserted the NBC prerequisite and why> > you believe Obama won't answer the question."> >> > You ignored my first inquiry while answering my second. So let me> > enlarge upon it. Why did the fathers insert this requirement and how> > do you believe Barack Obama can prove he qualifies?> >> > I don't know the answer to these questions and I'm not ashamed in the> > least to admit it. There's nothing wrong with not knowing — but> > there's lots wrong with not knowing and pretending otherwise.> >> >> > On 10/8/08, Andreas Schou <ophite at gmail.com> wrote:> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:41 AM, No Weatherman <no.weatherman at gmail.com> wrote:> >> > ACS,> >> >> >> > Your founding fathers argument is obvious but it doesn't answer the> >> > point and your jus sanguinus argument adds no light either.> >>> >>> >> Loud assertions aren't an argument. How does Obama's citizenship> >> status differ from our Presidents' up to Andrew Jackson?> >>> >>> >> > And rather than jingle with you on the dance floor all day long,> >> > please answer the question and tell us why you believe the fathers> >> > inserted the NBC prerequisite and why you believe Obama won't answer> >> > the question.> >>> >>> >> Obama won't submit to discovery from a nutjob (who, incidentally, is> >> also trying to sue the Bush family under RICO for causing 9/11) if he> >> can win on summary judgment. Basic lawyering.> >>> >> -- ACS> >>> >> > =======================================================> > List services made available by First Step Internet,> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.> > http://www.fsr.net> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com> > =======================================================> >> > =======================================================> List services made available by First Step Internet, > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. > http://www.fsr.net > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20081008/ba0d44db/attachment-0001.html