[Vision2020] [Bulk] Re: Dennis Avery & S. Fred Singer: Climate Science Frauds
Paul Rumelhart
godshatter at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 26 18:01:33 PDT 2008
Kai Eiselein, Editor wrote:
> Actually both sides of this debate require suspension of belief.
>
Not really. The Big Bang theory doesn't try to answer the question of
what happened before the singularity or what caused it to explode. It's
just there to explain certain observations, such as why the farther away
something is the greater it's redshift is, which it appears to do really
well. For example, the theory predicts certain ratios for the abundance
of certain elements as a by-product of the known state of the universe
within the first twenty minutes of it's starting point, which seems to
fit really closely with what we've observed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis
So there's little suspension of disbelief required. You just follow the
evidence, and don't worry about those kinds of questions (what happened
before the Big Bang?) until you have some kind of framework you can use
to address them.
A deity, on the other hand, requires a whole bunch of different beliefs
for which there is no evidence, nor is it predictive in any way.
Fortunately, belief in that system requires belief with a complete lack
of evidence (faith) and the assumption that no meaningful predictions
can occur (God works in mysterious ways), so it all works out in the end.
Paul
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list