[Vision2020] Detainees Are People Too: The Supreme Court Upholds the Magna Carta

nickgier at adelphia.net nickgier at adelphia.net
Wed Jun 25 11:42:57 PDT 2008


Greetings:

As promised, my radio commentary/column for this week.  The 900-word version is attached.

Nick Gier

DETAINEES ARE PEOPLE TOO: 
THE SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS MAGNA CARTA

In early 2003 British citizen Richard Reid, the infamous "shoe bomber" and Al Qaeda sympathizer, received a life sentence in a Boston court for attempting to blow up an American Airlines flight. In March, 2006 French citizen Zacarias Moussaoui was locked up for life in an American maximum security prison for his role in planning the 9/11 attacks. 

Just as with American terrorists Timothy McVeigh and Theodore Kaczkynski, Reid and Mousaoui were not beaten or tortured. On the contrary, they were given the right to counsel, the right to know the charges against them, and the right to defend themselves.

The recent Supreme Court decision essentially upholds the position that all persons, regardless of their origin or circumstances, have basic legal protections that go back to the Magna Carta of 1215.  

The Bush administration will now be embarrassed by prospect that because of indiscriminate arrests (using $3,000-$5,000 bounties as an inventive), most of the remaining Gauntanomo detainees will have to be released.

Reporters from the McClatchy newspapers have tracked down 66 of those who have already been released, and they concluded that at least two thirds of these people were not involved in terrorist actions or plans.  

Equally unfortunate is the fact that the few detainees who are probably guilty of heinous crimes will escape conviction because evidence obtained by torture is inadmissible in courts the good justices now require.  

The saddest fact of all is that because Bush chose his own form of cowboy justice, America's moral authority as a nation of decency and laws is ruined for the foreseeable future. 

In a June 27, 2004 interview with David Frost, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld admitted that "enhanced interrogation" techniques were used against Mohammed al-Katani.  Rumsfeld said that he was the only 9/11 suspect tortured and that was because he was a "very bad person." 

We now know that al-Katani was only one of many who were tortured on orders from the highest level. In his book "The One Percent Solution," Ronald Suskind reports that President Bush was personally involved in the decision to water board Abu Zubaydah.  Zubaydah immediately started talking about all sorts of plots, but not a single one checked out.

Even before Supreme Court decision, but a week before the release of Philippe Sands' "Torture Team: Rumsfeld's Memo and the Betrayal of American Values," the Pentagon announced on May 13, 2008 that it was dropping all charges against al-Katani.  

In his book Sands had exposed the details of the torture of al-Katani and how both Navy psychologists and FBI agents had objected to the methods used.  Furthermore, in an NPR interview on June 19, 2008, Sands reported that at the end of his 54-day ordeal, al-Katani was "spouting complete rubbish." 

When Sands testified before the House Judiciary Committee in May, 2008, he said that the U.S. should have learned from the British experience in Northern Ireland.  Initially, British officials approved of torture techniques that provided very little information, but they served as an excellent recruiting tool for potential terrorists.  

Sands, an attorney and professor at the University of London, estimated that torturing IRA suspects prolonged the conflict for 15-20 years.  In his NPR interview Sands said that an attorney who testified at the same hearing simply made up the claim that these techniques had elicited the names of 700 IRA suspects.

Sands has also interviewed European jurists who maintain that if Bush, Rumsfeld, or other American officials involved in torture travel to any foreign country, they might very well be arrested for war crimes. 

In October of 1999, while receiving medical care in England on the invitation of his good friend Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet was arrested on orders from a Spanish judge.  

Claiming the principle of "universal jurisdiction," the judge had good evidence that Pinochet's government had tortured a Spanish citizen.  A British court approved Pinochet's extradition to Spain, but he was finally allowed to return home because of ill health.

The House Judiciary Committee has the authority to investigate the evidence for Bush administration war crimes.  Wouldn't be better for Bush and Rumsfeld to attempt to clear their names in a U.S. court than to face an uncertain fate somewhere else in the world? The fact that they would not be executed in most countries would be at least one consolation.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Detainees900.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 16972 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080625/2ee7329c/attachment.pdf 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list