[Vision2020] [Bulk] Re: GITMO Detainees Can Challenge Detention
Paul Rumelhart
godshatter at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 12 22:39:17 PDT 2008
Why does the Supreme Court hate America?
Anywho, if our administration is so sure they have the biggest and
baddest terrorists at Gitmo, then it should be not be unusually onerous
for them to prove that in a court of law.
If they don't have enough proof to convict, then why are they so sure
they have the right people? Because they've waterboarded them?
Paul
Sunil Ramalingam wrote:
> They have never received anything like a trial as we know it. They
> have had 'hearings' in which they are unrepresented and are not
> allowed to see the evidence against them. That might be a trial
> elsewhere. In our tradition we never considered anything that
> farcical to be a trial before.
>
> Sunil
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:02:36 -0700
> From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> To: chasuk at gmail.com
> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] GITMO Detainees Can Challenge Detention
>
> Chas,
>
> They were not deprived of due process of law. They were tried, and
> found guilty before they are sent and locked up in Gitmo. The
> reason they are not tried in American Civilian Courts is because
> they are not US Citizens and because if they were it would expose
> US classified information which would put US soldiers and possibly
> civilians at risk.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Donovan
>
> */Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com>/* wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 18:59, Donovan Arnold
> wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should create an "Adopt a Detainee" program. Those
> that think they
> > are innocent detainees can line up and open their homes to
> people considered
> > to be unfairly detained at Gitmo. If they really believe
> that these people
> > are innocent, and they are released, it would be unfair to
> send them back to
> > their home country to be killed, right?
>
> I don't have any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the Gitmo
> detainees, so I won't be inviting them into my house, thank you.
> However, that doesn't mean that I believe they should have been
> deprived of the due process of law, which is the real subject
> here.
>
> Chas
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list