[Vision2020] How Could Anyone Support That Woman?

[lfalen]

Tom
By stimulating business growth. Tax increases will result in a net loss of revenue, because it will put a lot of small bussiness out of business and make larger businesses hesitant to make new investments. I think I have said this before.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: Tom Hansen thansen at moscow.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:46:18 -0800
To: lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com,  idahotom at hotmail.com, sunilramalingam at hotmail.com,  vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] How Could Anyone Support That Woman?

> Again I ask, Mr. Falen -
> 
> How are tax cuts going to "give them all the support we can in the field 
> and continue to take care of the veterans when they come home"?
> 
> We both want to realize support for our troops to our government's fullest 
> capabilities.  
> 
> What I want to know from you, Mr. Falen, is how would we be able to 
> provide the resources that our troops so desperately need and 
> simlultaneously cut taxes?  What funds would our government apply to 
> subsidize these resources?
> 
> If your answer is "Trim the fat from government spending", What fat 
> (specifically) and by how much?
> 
> You do realize, of course, that many, MANY veterans programs are currently 
> surviviing on "shoe string" budgets that are trimmed more and more each 
> year, beginning with health care.
> 
> As a disably retired veteran, Mr. Falen, I am anticipating degeneration of 
> my health benefits (Tri-Care), coupled with increased personal cost, over 
> the next couple years.
> 
> Convince me, Mr. Falen, how these increased costs to me, and millions of 
> other veterans, can be avoided.
> 
> Seeya round town, Moscow.
> 
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> > Sunil and Tom
> > I think that going into Afghanistan was justified. Iraq was debatable, 
> but since we are
> are there, it would be a disaster to pull out and leave the place is 
> chaos. I think we
> should do everything we can to support  the troops with what ever supplies 
> they need to do
> the job and keep them as safe as possible. The first priority at home 
> should be supporting
> the veterans. More should be spent on upgrading the Veteran's 
> Administration. I know that
> a lot of you on vision2020 do not agree with supply side economics and 
> Arthur Laffer.  You
> may think it is an oxymoron, but it makes sense to me. I believe a tax cut 
> will stimulate
> business, put people back to work and expand the economy. A tax increase 
> will do the
> reverse.
> >
> Roger
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> This message was sent by First Step Internet.
>            http://www.fsr.com/
> 
>