[Vision2020] Otter Has Plan to Raise Millions for Roads

Wed Feb 27 18:48:54 PST 2008

The problem with Idaho is that it uses regressive taxation. This places a disproportionate burden of state financing  projects on the backs of the poorest people in the state. 

  I think Idaho should not tax food, over the counter medicine, and other needed items. It also should structure the taxation not to place an overwhelming burden on the poor. It should not use regressive taxation as a major source of revenue. 

  Where this $150 is really gonna whack people is the elderly that live on a $800-$1000 a month check, and only drive a few times a month. They are going to have to shave off another 3% of their income to pay for this. Many will not be able to afford a car and will have to rely on others for transportation. This will have other impacts on us too, because the elderly are the ones that keep are insurance rates low. So expect to be paying more for insurance in the future if this passes. 

  There are several other solutions to employ first, I think, before raising taxes to maintain and repair roads. The first thing I would do is fine construction companies for taking too long to repair or build a road. That revenue could be put forward to shave off future construction projects. Another tactic would be go to longevity of a contract for a road, not just who can do it for the cheapest amount of money. A final revenue for raising revenue is to tax commercial vehicles that use Idaho roads to transport goods and services across the state. Many trucking and shipping companies drive through Idaho to other states. We charge one of the lowest rates in the country to do this. If big commercial vehicles are damaging our roads, we need to collect money from those companies taking advantage of the cheaper use of our roads and public utilities they are making profits off of. 

  I disagree with the suggestion of state mandating of raising wages. Raising wages causes inflation which decreases the value of the dollar. This hurts people on fixed low income, and destroys the savings of those that worked very hard to accumulate that wealth. What we need to do is make the cost of living more affordable by controlling the costs of food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and transportation. 

  Comparing California, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Montana, and Wyoming taxation systems is fine, but the Governor needs to realize that their are big differences that exist that may not work well or fairly in this state. 

  I seriously oppose this new $150 tax, and will oppose any politician in November that supports and promotes it. 

  Best Regards,

  Donovan   

Tom Ivie <the_ivies3 at yahoo.com> wrote:
  ...or no sales tax?

Tom Ivie <the_ivies3 at yahoo.com> wrote:   ...and how many of those "surrounding states" with higher vehicle registration rates have a state income tax?

Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:        st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }               From today’s (February 26, 2008) Spokesman Review –

  “Proposal includes increasing vehicle registration fee to $150”

  Remember the sole-parent, hard-working Idaho waiter(ress) example I presented earlier?  Remember how (s)he drops off his/her child at a day care center (that does not require background investigations of its employees), working as a waiter(ress) for $3.50 an hour (since Idaho allows employers to include anticipated tips as part of their employee’s income)?  Well . . . that same waiter(ress) must pay $150 minimum each year to keep his/her car on the road so shat (s)he can get to work.

  If Governor Otter truly does wish to stay in step with local states, I suggest he increase minimum wage to $8.00 an hour and start taxing services (i.e. attorneys), instead of dumping the financial burden on those who so sorely cannot afford it.

  ------------------------------------------------------

  Otter has plan to raise millions for roads 
  Proposal includes increasing vehicle registration fee to $150

  John Miller 
  Associated Press
  February 27, 2008

  BOISE – Gov. Butch Otter is touting fee increases he says will help raise an additional $202 million annually by 2011 to maintain Idaho's roads and bridges, including a plan for substantially higher registration fees for cars.

  In addition to those hikes, proposals discussed at a meeting Tuesday of the House and Senate transportation committees to increase money for roads also include a 4 percent rental car tax and increasing fees on commercial truckers.

  The Idaho Transportation Department estimates it will have an annual $200 million highway funding shortfall in coming years. If Idaho doesn't take action to bridge the gap, officials say the only other alternative is to develop a strategic withdrawal from maintaining some roads so the state has enough cash left over for its most-important thoroughfares.

  "There are plenty of projects we could do, if we had the money to do them," Darrell Manning, the chairman of the Idaho Transportation Board, told lawmakers. "We have procrastinated too long."

  According to Otter's proposals, he's pushing a 4 percent tax on rental cars that would raise about $1.3 million annually.

  Otter also wants to gradually boost fees on commercial truckers, raising $25 million in the 12 months starting July 1 and increasing the proceeds to $50 million by 2011. About $22 million would come from light trucks, with the rest from larger tractor trailers. Otter hasn't proposed specific legislation; instead he's working with lawmakers and the trucking industry to come up with a package that accomplishes his goals.

  "We wanted to find some middle ground," said Sen. Tim Corder, R-Mountain Home and a trucking company owner who has been helping draft proposals for his industry.

  By far the largest piece of Otter's package to increase roads revenue calls for boosting registration fees for personal vehicles to a flat rate of $150 annually, from between $24 and $48 now, depending on a car's model year. After the changes, Idaho would rank just 17th among states in registration costs, said Clete Edmunson, Otter's transportation policy adviser.

  "Even by increasing revenue up to $150, it's still fair and it's still equitable with the surrounding states," Edmunson said.

  Some lawmakers already indicated opposition to trying to raise the lion's share of new revenue by increasing registration fees for cars.

  Rep. Phylis King, D-Boise, said it made little sense that people who drive their cars very little should pay the same as those who use their cars every day for long distances.

  "My neighbor who is 90 years old drives very little," King said. "So why not raise your gas tax? I think for seniors, it would be fairer to charge per mile."

  Edmunson countered that Otter is philosophically opposed to raising the state's 25-cent-a-gallon gas tax, which hasn't been increased since 1996. Transportation Department officials also contend revenue from Idaho's gas tax is stagnating and can't be counted on in years to come, especially as cars improve their gas mileage.

  -----------------------

  Details of Otter's plan 

  Registration fees: The current state registration fee – excluding county charges – would be increased to $150, from $24 to $48 now, depending on the car's model year. The plan would raise $134 million more in revenue by fiscal year 2011, according to the governor's estimates.

  Rental cars: Rental cars would be taxed at 4 percent; the resulting $1.3 million in proceeds would be deposited directly in the State Highway Account.

  Truckers: Gov. Otter, lawmakers and the trucking industry are working on a plan that would raise $25 million in fiscal year 2009 from commercial trucks, with revenue rising to $50 million by 2011. About $22 million would come from fees on light trucks, with the rest coming from larger tractor-trailers.

  ISP shift: Otter wants to shift $16.7 million in funding for the Idaho State Police that now comes from transportation-related fees. Instead, the money would be taken from the state general fund. That would free up money for road work. The Joint Finance-Appropriations budget writing committee has already expressed skepticism over the shift, recommending against it.

  ------------------------------------------------------

  Seeya round town, Moscow.

  Tom Hansen
  Moscow, Idaho

            "If not us, who?
If not now, when?"

- Unknown

=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet, 
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
http://www.fsr.net 
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

Tom & Liz Ivie   

---------------------------------
  Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. =======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet, 
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
http://www.fsr.net 
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

Tom & Liz Ivie     
---------------------------------
  Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet, 
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
http://www.fsr.net 
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080227/b370746c/attachment-0001.html 