[Vision2020] Campaign Finance Reform/ was Narcissist Nader May Run Attention
Chasuk
chasuk at gmail.com
Sat Feb 23 18:36:12 PST 2008
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Garrett Clevenger
<garrettmc at verizon.net> wrote:
> From what I know about the minority opinion of the
> Supreme Court ruling on this, they say [campaign finance reform] violates
> "free speech"
Hmm. Tough call. Free speech isn't absolute. We can't defame,
perjure, divulge company secrets, or advocate the overthrow of the
government, to name a few restrictions. Obviously, limitations are
sometimes necessary. Maybe I could make the argument that unregulated
campaign financing (or loosely regulated campaign financing) favors
the have-mores.
As Bush said at a fundraiser in 2000:
"This is an impressive crowd - the haves and the have-mores. Some
people call you the elites; I call you my base."
<sarcasm on> Still, do we want the poor and disenfranchised to be able
to run for President? They might keep chickens in the Oval Office.
</sarcasm off>
Seriously, this is a difficult question.
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list