[Vision2020] Noise Ordinance
Mike Finkbiner
mike_l_f at hotmail.com
Sun Oct 28 09:23:56 PDT 2007
I'm a firm believer that people ought to be able to do what they want on
their own property, but when the results pass the property line they become
an issue for the neighbors. If you paint your house chartreuse and purple
or post obnoxious slogans people don't have to look, but if you crank your
stereo in the middle of the night or have a 50 million candle power yard
light, not looking doesn't do the job.
I agree that we should be able to find a compromise for the noise ordinance.
While Garrett is right to have some concerns about the police being able
to cite people at any time for unspecified noise complaints, the current
system is too cumbersome.
One problem with requiring a name on a complaint is that some offenders will
want to retaliate, so allowing officers to investigate on their own makes
sense. Perhaps a written warning for the first offense, and a citation on
the second offense within a month. I don't know what the legalities are,
but if the written warning is considered formal notice to everyone living at
an address, whoever is responsible for subsequent noise incidents gets the
citation.
Political speech should be protected, but if my neighbor wants to hold a
high-energy Perot for President gathering in a residential neighborhood at
midnight, I think they should be told to take it someplace else.
Mike Finkbiner
mike_l_f at hotmail.com
Disclaimer: No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a
significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list