[Vision2020] real economic development in Moscow

[Darrell Keim]

Bruce,
Responses below:


On 10/25/07, Bruce and Jean Livingston <jeanlivingston at turbonet.com> wrote:
>
>  Darrell, good to hear from you again.
>
> I don't think I disagree with you on any point in this post.  And I don't
> see any point you make as inconsistent with my personal feelings about the
> best future direction of the city.
>

I really wasn't seeking to be inflammatory with the post, more
informational.  A lot of people don't consider the business environment and
its impact on our town when they talk quality of life.


> I recognize the existence here of a healthy retail economy and a vibrant
> downtown, and I acknowledge that they contribute to our quality of life.
> Are you suggesting that either our local retail or business climate is not
> healthy?  If so, what is unhealthy and how would you propose to make things
> healthier?
>

I've talked to alot of people about this of late, and got a lot of
opinions.  One of the goals I've set for myself as the new Chamber E.D. is
to meet with several of our member businesses each week.  I ask them a
variety of questions, and always include this one:  "What do you think is
the biggest issue facing Moscow business?"  Over half have told me they
think it is the cities anti-business reputation, be it real or simply
perceived.

Even if the reputation is simply something perceived, with no basis in
reality, it is an impediment to business that we need to be concerned about.


>
> Bruce
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Darrell Keim <keim153 at gmail.com>
> *To:* Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>
> *Cc:* Tom Hansen <idahotom at hotmail.com> ; v2020 <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:22 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vision2020] real economic development in Moscow
>
>
>  Bill et al:
>
> I was at the MCA's recent economic forum.  I found it to be very
> interesting in both what was addressed, and what wasn't.  I felt the
> panelists did a fair job of describing what aspects of Moscow drew them to
> locate here.  Nice parks, short/no commute, culture, universities, etc.  If
> pushed, I think the panelists would summarize what brought them as quality
> of life.  Also mentioned as reasons for coming to Moscow were Alturas and
> the Small Business Incubator.
>
> I liked what BJ Swanson had to say about the importance of bringing in
> higher paying jobs (The example in her case being tech. jobs.  Other types
> of high paying jobs create the same phenomenon).  Essentially, she advocated
> for working to bring in higher paying jobs, and that retail businesses would
> follow.  I think I can accurately quote her as saying "You can't build an
> economy on retail jobs alone."
>
> Or, as Stu Scott said at another recent economic forum (paraphrasing
> again), some businesses re-circulate and slightly magnify the dollar. To
> truly grow the economy you've got to manufacture something. (The same forum
> mentioned something like $1.15 going into the economy for every $1 spent at
> a local chain store.  And, $1.25 going into the local economy for every
> dollar spent at a locally owned merchant.  I digress...)
>
> I can agree with almost all of the above discussed at the forum.  I would
> add that Moscow has traditionally "manufactured" education and agriculture.
> The UI and agriculture have been our biggest "factories."  And, just as BJ's
> model predicts, those high paying education and ag. "factories" brought in
> what we currently have for a business climate.
>
> Now for the part that I found interesting because of its absence:
> How is quality of life defined?
> How does our local business climate fit into the quality of life picture?
>
> *The above, it seems to me, is the crux of our current civic debate.*
>
> So, how is quality of life defined?
> Ask a hundred people and get a hundred different answers.
>
> The panelists listed as quality of life indicators such things as: parks,
> walkability, little traffic.  Quality of life must have something else to
> it, too.  If quality of life is ONLY the items listed by the forum, then I
> humbly suggest that Garfield and Oakesdale also fit the bill quite nicely to
> become hotbeds of technological development.
>
> Hopefully you understand the above was sarcasm.
>
> I believe there is another, as yet unmentioned, aspect of quality of
> life.  I submit that what makes Moscow's quality of life so good is the
> great combination we have of parks, traffic, etc; with our engaged
> citizenry, and good local economy.
>
> How does our local business climate fit into the quality of life picture?
> In a lot of ways, our existing businesses are what make our quality of
> life possible:
> Businesses provide the jobs that allow people to live here.
> Businesses pay taxes helping to make our parks and infrastructure
> possible. (Incidentally, the businesses also make it possible for the people
> that live here to pay taxes.)
> Businesses make it possible for us to get our "necessities" locally.
> I'm sure others can come up with more to add to the list.
>
> Smart businesses looking to locate here realize they won't be operating in
> a vacuum.  They look at ALL of our local business and social environment
> before deciding to grow here.  They look from a business perspective at our
> city government, infrastructure, parks, ecology, businesses already present,
> etc.
>
> Smart businesses also look at a bigger picture beyond "bottom line"
> items.  They look from a social perspective to see if their employees will
> be happy living in the community, again looking at our city government,
> infrastructure, parks, ecology, businesses already present, etc.  Both
> perspectives must be promising for it to be a strong match.
>
> Moscow would be unattractive to high wage paying employers if we did not
> already have a strong mix of local businesses and retail stores.
>
> To put it simply, prospective businesses are looking to grow their new
> "factories" on the shoulders of what is already here.
>
> I strongly believe in working to bring in high paying jobs.  To do so we
> must be aware of what about our existing structure is going to be an
> attractor, and we must work to keep it healthy.
>
> Later,
> Darrell
>
>
> > R-
> > You missed the point.
> > These high-tech jobs can go anywhere.  All towns want them.
> > The entrepreneurs can be choosy, and they are choosy.  They want towns
> with
> > a high quality of life.
> > If Moscow sacrifices its high quality of life for (what you describe as)
> > "almost anything that will provide jobs, increase the tax base and
> improve
> > the overall economy", then we lose what now attracts these high-tech
> jobs.
> > You just can not have it both ways.
> > I want to live in a town that maintains its high quality of life and
> > therefore is attractive to high-tech jobs  -- not a town that has no
> > standards but goes for any growth.
> > BL
>
> ------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20071026/613bd794/attachment-0001.html