[Vision2020] [Bulk] UI Fails to Meet Living Wage Requirement
Warren Hayman
whayman at roadrunner.com
Thu Oct 11 19:56:58 PDT 2007
I'm not quite sure how 80 % of progress equates to 80 % of employees. Sounds
dangerously similar to mixing cardinal and ordinal numbers.
Warren Hayman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Rumelhart" <godshatter at yahoo.com>
To: <nickgier at adelphia.net>
Cc: <vision2020 at moscow.com>; "Thomas Hansen" <tomh at uidaho.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] [Bulk] UI Fails to Meet Living Wage Requirement
> Nick,
>
> I work closely with people in HR, and know that the goal of getting all
> of our employees up to a living wage is an important one there, and has
> been for a while. The devil, of course, is in the details.
> Specifically, who is going to pay for it. I don't know where they are
> with that project, but I know it's being actively pursued and I know
> that the people working on it care greatly about it.
>
> Also, the memo states that 80% of the progress has been made adjusting
> our workforce to a living wage. I take that to mean that of the number
> of employees identified as being below a living wage, 80% of them have
> been moved up to a living wage. I have no idea if that's true or not,
> but that's how I read it. Having 20% of our workforce below a living
> wage seems too large of a number to me. That would be about 500 people,
> since we have somewhere between 2300 and 2500 board-appointed employees
> (I can't remember the exact number, and it changes weekly).
>
> I can agree that the administration seems to get the best raises. The
> important question is: are we getting our money's worth? I have no idea
> how to answer that one.
>
> Paul
>
> nickgier at adelphia.net wrote:
>> Greetings:
>>
>> I was looking for another story for the next issue of "Faculty Advocate,"
>> and here it is. See the memo below from UI Financial VP about not being
>> able to meet Moscow's living wage of $10.75 per hour.
>>
>> Almost 20 percent of UI employees receive salaries that are under the
>> poverty line, and now many of them will have to wait even longer for
>> their meager crumbs.
>>
>> Over 25 years UI upper administration salaries went up 274%, while full
>> professor salaries increased 175%. The Consumer Price Index for that
>> same period was 202. There were many years when faculty got raises and
>> the staff did not, so I'm sure that staff are even further behind the
>> CPI.
>>
>> A few years ago Idaho public employees had an opportunity to affiliate
>> with the Service Employees International Union, the most progressive and
>> fastest growing union in the America. But the words "progressive" and
>> "union" were just to much for a majority of these good folk.
>>
>> Some of you may remember my recent column on economic inequality. It is
>> alive and well at the UI.
>>
>> There is more than enough money in the raises the administration just
>> received to bring staff salaries up to the Moscow City level of $10.75.
>> That's Walmart's average wage, for God's sake!
>>
>> Workers of America Arise! You have nothing to lose except your chains!
>>
>> Nick Gier, President, Higher Education Council, Idaho Federation of
>> Teachers, AFL-CIO
>>
>> Vice Provost Pitman and A-VP Johnson,
>>
>> As you know we have made about 80% of the necessary university-wide
>> progress during the last fiscal year to adjust our workforce up to living
>> wage. A great amount of that success came from internal adjustments as
>> well as from recent pay adjustments from both the State and from the
>> University.
>>
>> I promised you feedback not later than October of 07 as to if we could
>> finish up the remaining approximate 20% that we have yet to work and
>> this correspondence is that feedback. I apologize for being ten days
>> late; however, I wanted to see for sure if we had any viable alternatives
>> and it was worth waiting as long as we could for enrollment figures and
>> any other potential alternative fund streams and so I took an extra few
>> days.
>>
>> With the flat enrollment and the overall reduction of our appropriation
>> this last year, from what we received the year before, it is not
>> possible, at this time, to make those final living wage adjustments.
>> However, we remain committed on this one and a lot of our capability or
>> lack thereof will be predicated off of the Governor’s recommended pay
>> adjustment and any specific constraints that will or perhaps not be tied
>> to it, our own movement on our Health and Benefits and potential cost
>> avoidance (which it is too soon to tell on this right now) and our future
>> enrollment.
>>
>> I briefed the President today (and later, the Provost) and did recommend
>> at the end of the brief to the President (and it was accepted) for us at
>> University “Central” to do nothing at this stage on our potential
>> remaining living wage adjustments. We at “central” do not have the
>> appropriated dollars at this time to funnel into this initiative. He
>> concurred and yet he too is aware of some of the parameters, that if they
>> were to change in a more positive manner and allow us to entertain this
>> idea again in the near future. Just today there was an article in the
>> Spokesman paper on the same issue as it will remain a challenge for this
>> part of our Country. As you know, there is no mandated requirement to
>> afford salaries that attain the living wage; however, it remains a viable
>> objective for us to strive toward accomplishing. We will continue to
>> monitor and look for viable courses of action on this one.
>>
>> Not the news you would prefer and I understand that. We will remain
>> vigilant and aware on this as we move through the rest of the fiscal
>> year.
>>
>> Lloyd Muse, UI Financial VP
>>
>> =======================================================
>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>> http://www.fsr.net
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
>
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list