[Vision2020] Strange response to cogent argumentation

[Andreas Schou]

Chris --

Frankly, I think it's better for all of us if we don't even respond.

I think virtually everything you've said on the Viz is self-evidently
ethically abominable. The more you talk, the better we look.

-- ACS

On Nov 12, 2007 8:41 PM, Christopher Witmer
<christopher.witmer at mizuho-sc.com> wrote:
> Regarding my refutation of Mr. Campbell's flawed argumentation in favor of
> the levy, proponents of the levy on V2020 have taken the following approach:
>
> 1) Totally ignore the content of my post.
> 2) Shift the focus instead to something totally unrelated and totally
> irrelevant to the substance of the post: focus on personalities rather than
> issues.
>
> Nobody has even interacted with, much less refuted, a single thing that I
> wrote concerning Mr. Campbell's flawed arguments in favor of the levy. If
> you go back and re-read my post you will see that I focused exclusively on
> the substance of Mr. Campbell's post. When someone you personally dislike is
> involved, do you all become incapable of making a cogent response to a
> cogent argument? I would like to think that you are capable of better.
>
> -- Chris
>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>