[Vision2020] Why is this not treason?

[lfalen]

Nether case is treason. Both are wrong and should be prosecuted.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Tom Hansen" thansen at moscow.com
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:33:03 -0700
To: "'keely emerinemix'" kjajmix1 at msn.com,  "'Art Deco'" deco at moscow.com, "'Vision 2020'" vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Why is this not treason?

> Let me see if I have this right.
> 
>  
> 
> One of Clinton's chief aids inadvertently walks out of the Library of
> Congress with a photocopy of a recently declassified document (last year or
> so) and people want him brought up on criminal charges.
> 
>  
> 
> One of our government's primary contractors admits to sending highly
> classified documents overseas is penalized $100 million, half of which will
> be re-compensated back to the contractor through an arrangement made by one
> of the non-fired US Attorneys in agreement on yet another contract.
> 
>  
> 
> Is that right?
> 
>  
> 
> Tom Hansen
> 
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
>                                                   
> 
> "As more and more heathens 'choose' to not have children the number of Godly
> souls will increase. If the number of Christian births out number the number
> of Islamic births the battle will be over in 3 or 4 generations."
> 
> - Doug "No-Clue" Farris (March 10, 2007) 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of keely emerinemix
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:14 PM
> To: Art Deco; Vision 2020
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Why is this not treason?
> 
>  
> 
> Because . . . I don't know . . . we've re-defined "treason" as "not doing
> what Cheney and Bush, et al, say we should do to support the troops"?  And
> "asking hard questions of the incompetents in office," as well as "buying
> Dixie Chicks CDs."
> 
> This is certainly an outrage, very likely treasonous, and won't be
> prosecuted as such because it's business, and business is the elixir of the
> right.
> 
> keely
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: deco at moscow.com
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:49:58 -0700
> Subject: [Vision2020] Why is this not treason?
> 
> Why are not the acts described below treason?  Why have not the responsible
> parties been tried for treason?  Instead the company has been reward with a
> new contract with $50 of the $100 million applied in payment of that
> contract.
> 
>  
> 
> Perhaps all you V 2020 clear-headed Bush Administration Apologist can
> explain?
> 
>  
> 
> W.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Defense contractor admits sending classified materials overseas, will pay
> $100 million penalty
> 
> 
> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The leading manufacturer of night vision gear for the
> Defense Department has admitted sending classified materials overseas and
> will pay a $100 million penalty, according to federal prosecutors, who say
> the actions of ITT Corp. have jeopardized the security of U.S. soldiers.
> ITT, based in Roanoke, Va., exported classified or sensitive technical data
> to China, Singapore and Britain without having obtained authorization from
> the United States, prosecutors said.
> The conviction is the first involving a major defense contractor violating
> the Arms Export Control Act, prosecutors said.
> Saying that American soldiers are "the principal victims of ITT's crimes,"
> U.S. Attorney John Brownlee said he has structured the $100 million penalty
> so that half of the money is spent by ITT to develop a next-generation night
> vision system and "ensure that our soldiers have the best night vision
> equipment in the world." --From CNN Producer Mike M. Ahlers (Posted 12:36
> p.m.)
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> i'm making a difference. Make every IM count for the cause of your choice.
> Join now!
> <http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0080000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://im
> .live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=wlmailtagline> 
> 
> 
>