[Vision2020] Courtney's Numbers

keely emerinemix kjajmix1 at msn.com
Wed Mar 21 11:21:28 PDT 2007 

I will assume that I have nearly as much experience in print journalism as 
Kai, and that sets the context for what I'm about to say:

Bull.

The DN has been co-opted and manipulated once again by the Kirk and its 
leaders.  The DN owes its readers a retraction, and Dale Courtney should be 
mortified but probably lacks the capacity.

I understand the difference, Kai, between the ed page and the news pages, 
and "the views herein are not necessarily representative of the publishers" 
means that the guest columnist's declaration that rocky road is the best ice 
cream may very well be at odds with the ed board's selection of mint 
chocolate chip, the publisher's choice of vanilla, and the readership's 
various favorites.  It doesn't cover something reasonably akin to "ice cream 
is really made of boogers," which is about the level of reasoned debate we 
got two days from Courtney.

keely


From: "Kai Eiselein, editor" <editor at lataheagle.com>
To: "Art Deco" <deco at moscow.com>, "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Courtney's Numbers
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:58:44 -0700

Facts or no facts, editorials merely express OPINION of the writer. Opinion
is NOT news, hence it has its own page, away from "news".
Quit confusing the two.
Traditionally, opinion writers have been given rather loose rein, hence "The
views expressed on these pages are not neccesarily those of this newspapers
or its advertisers"
Their job is to inspire, anger and cajol people into discussion. Obviously
its worked here.
If an editorial doesn't anger someone, the writer hasn't done the job.


-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]On Behalf Of Art Deco
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 7:30 AM
To: Vision 2020
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Courtney's Numbers


Good suggestion Sue.  However, based on the DN's failure to use facts in
some of their past editorials, especially those written by Murf on NSA, etc,
I doubt the DN really cares that much.

W.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sue Hovey" <suehovey at moscow.com>
To: "keely emerinemix" <kjajmix1 at msn.com>; <thansen at moscow.com>;
<vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Courtney's Numbers


 >I would suggest someone--Tom, maybe, call the DN and ask Murf to accept a
 > refutation based on this information.  Murf is quite willing when one has
 > a
 > response to chicanery already printed, even when the deadline has passed.
 > He did that for us last year so we could respond to the garbage that
 > appeared right before Shirley's re-election.
 >
 > Sue
 >
 >
 > ----- Original Message -----
 > From: "keely emerinemix" <kjajmix1 at msn.com>
 > To: <thansen at moscow.com>; <vision2020 at moscow.com>
 > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:39 PM
 > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Courtney's Numbers
 >
 >
 >> Tom, this is amazing.  It's one thing to hide behind stats and data
 >> because
 >> your real viewpoint is too odious for people to accept -- but to use 
them
 >> with such carelessness, not knowing or not caring that they're out of
 >> date,
 >> is really disappointing.
 >>
 >> Even from Dale Courtney.  And I've regrettably set that bar pretty 
damned
 >> low.
 >>
 >> The fact remains:  There isn't a levy rate, enrollment gain, test-score
 >> result, graduation rate or anything else that would make Dale Courtney
 >> support a public schools levy, and I appreciate the bravery you show
 >> here,
 >> Tom, in exposing Dale's chicanery.
 >>
 >> keely
 >>
 >>
 >> From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
 >> To: "Vision 2020" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
 >> Subject: [Vision2020] Courtney's Numbers
 >> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:35:17 -0700
 >>
 >> Greetings Visionaires -
 >>
 >> Concerning this year's school levy . . .
 >>
 >> I have just glanced over several of Dale Courtney's on-line files
 >> concerning
 >> his argument against the 2007 school levy located at:
 >>
 >> http://MoscowLevy.com/March2007.htm
 >>
 >> and compared them to the on-line files concerning his argument against
 >> the
 >> 2005 school levy located at:
 >>
 >> http://MoscowLevy.com
 >>
 >> I know that this is the site he used to argue against the 2005 levy,
 >> since
 >> it clearly states at the top of the page:
 >>
 >> "Here is a resource to which you can turn for information about the
 >> Moscow
 >> School District levy on 26 April 2005."
 >>
 >> I was interested in finding results of recent research that he may have
 >> conducted.
 >>
 >> Primarily I reviewed the files dealing with "Administrative Bloat".  He
 >> not
 >> only is using the same numbers from 2005.  He is using the same files.
 >> The
 >> most recent data in the files that I reviewed was for 2004/2005.
 >>
 >> He didn't event bother copying, renaming, and pasting the files into a
 >> 2007
 >> directory.  The links within his 2007 levy web pages are the very same,
 >> identical links found in his 2005 levy web pages.
 >>
 >> His property tax information, located at:
 >>
 >> http://moscowlevy.com/waste.htm
 >>
 >> is almost five years old.
 >>
 >> Thoughts?
 >>
 >> Stay tuned.  More to come.
 >>
 >> Tom Hansen
 >> Moscow, Idaho
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> =======================================================
 >>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
 >>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
 >>                http://www.fsr.net
 >>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
 >> =======================================================
 >>
 >> _________________________________________________________________
 >> It's tax season, make sure to follow these few simple tips
 >>
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.a
spx?icid=HMMartagline
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
 > 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
 >
 >
 >> =======================================================
 >> List services made available by First Step Internet,
 >> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
 >>               http://www.fsr.net
 >>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
 >> =======================================================
 >
 >
 > 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
 >
 >
 > No virus found in this incoming message.
 > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.15/728 - Release Date: 
3/20/2007
 > 8:07 AM
 >
 > =======================================================
 > List services made available by First Step Internet,
 > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
 >               http://www.fsr.net
 >          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
 > =======================================================
 >

=======================================================
  List services made available by First Step Internet,
  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                http://www.fsr.net
           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================


__________ NOD32 2130 (20070321) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com


=======================================================
  List services made available by First Step Internet,
  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                http://www.fsr.net
           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN 
Presents today. 
http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline&ocid=T002MSN03A07001

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list