[Vision2020] CO2 Science

[Ted Moffett]

>
> Roger et. al.
>
> Thanks for your reply...
>
> I think it important to consider all points of view and be open minded,
> not such an easy thing to do!  I fail often at being open minded.  While I
> remain convinced that the overwhelming majority scientific assessment is
> that human activity is inducing potentially dangerous global warming, with
> enough probability to warrant substantive action to slow our CO2 and other
> greenhouse gas emissions, I will continue to study the counter views to this
> position.
>
> I think we can reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and still maintain a
> good standard of living, though this may mean some very powerful
> business concerns will lose out to other emerging interests.  Our mostly
> fossil fueled economy will go the way of the horse and buggy, and lifestyle
> adjustments may be necessary.  This is inevitable given that fossil fuels
> will deplete.  And our current dependence on foreign oil is a national
> security risk we should mitigate, as former Federal Reserve Chairman Allan
> Greenspan warned in ominous tone as he spoke before the US Congress on
> solving the USA's energy problems.
>
> Ted Moffett
>
>
>
>
> On 3/19/07, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ted
> >
> > Thanks for posting the web site for CO2 Science. I just had a chance to
> > read it. What they say sounds plausible. When I get a chance I will check
> > out their credentials.  I don't know if they are valid or not. I am glad
> > that you are open to other views.  After I retire and have more time I would
> > like to meet you. Perhaps we could get together for a beer with Gary, Kai,
> > Wayne and Chas.
> > Roger
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20070320/076cfed7/attachment.html