[Vision2020] Breaking News: Judge Does Not Dismiss the MSD Lawsuit

[heirdoug at netscape.net]

No Keely, I wasn't being snarky. I wouldn't want to claim crown rights 
to that department, that is your gifting. You presumed wrongly. Don't 
you recall that "presumption only brings strife". You really ought to 
act upon what you believe and not just preach it.



  I was just commenting on the outcome of today's first round. I was 
cheering on the team to victory in this dodge ball game of public 
school politics. Those high dollar lawyers, that MSD had to re-align 
their budget for, lost. That's all. They were praying for the enemy to 
be vanquished in this motion, once and for all and it didn't happen. 
I'm sure they will come out and say, just as you are now, all sorts of 
evil things against the Judge or Jerry or the taxpayers or somebody but 
the one thing they won't say is that they lost. One must never admit 
defeat so early in the game.



The taxpayers team scored a goal and I was just being cheerful nothing 
more.



Keely, you are such a wizard with words. I could never in all my days, 
come up with such witty comments. You make me feel that my words are so 
inferior compared to some one with your talents. You truly must know 
more than I! To be a Wiz is one thing, to wiz into the wind is not 
advised.



Thanks for being so you!



Doug!





-----Original Message-----

From: keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com>

To: heirdoug at netscape.net; vision2020 at moscow.com

Sent: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 3:58 pm

Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Breaking News: Judge Does Not Dismiss the MSD 
Lawsuit



























Doug writes, "Well, what do you know?" at the news that Judge Bradbury 
has determined that Jerry Weitz has legal standing to continue his suit 
against MSD.  Snarkiness is presumed.



Well, Doug, here's what I know:  This is not the ruling I would have 
liked, but it means just what it means.  That is . . . Weitz has legal 
standing to continue his suit.  That's all.  It doesn't mean that the 
suit itself has merit, and it doesn't mean that Weitz was acting in the 
best interest of his community.  And I know this, Doug:  The judge can 
rule on the former, but not on the latter.  And you are unqualified to 
judge on either.



Now, I'm also not qualified. But from what I know -- likely a bit more 
than you do -- I think the suit operates on a faulty premise and is 
insincere in its execution and intent, but I'm willing to let the court 
judge 'til the end.  THE END, Doug, THE END.  This isn't it.



keely







"And these women that you spit on as they try to change their worlds/

Are immune to your consultations . . . they're quite aware of what 
they're going through"

(With apologies to David Bowie)





> To: vision2020 at moscow.com

> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:25:58 -0400

> From: heirdoug at netscape.net

> Subject: [Vision2020] Breaking News: Judge Does Not Dismiss the MSD 
Lawsuit

>

>

>

> Second District Judge John Bradbury determined that Jerry Weitz does

> have standing to bring the lawsuit against Moscow School District. 
The

> judge did not dismiss the case, as MSD requested.

>

>

>

> Published Friday, June 29, 2007 1:59 PM by Right-Mind

>

>

>

>

>

> Well what do you know, Moscow.

>

>

> 
________________________________________________________________________

> Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and

> industry-leading spam and email virus protection.

>

> =======================================================

>  List services made available by First Step Internet,

>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.

>                http://www.fsr.net

>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com

> =======================================================







Change is good. See what's different about Windows Live Hotmail. Check 
it out!=










________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and 
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.