[Vision2020] And Justice for All

[Art Deco]

Schwaller writes:

"Word has it that a recently (May 2007) released multiple sex offender may be on his way back to jail as a result of a probation violation."

Whose word?  Is it a matter of public record?  If so, need you be so hesitant to divulge the identity of the felon and the circumstances?  If not, how do you know the allegation to be true?

Most of us consider sex offenders to be serious business.  I hope you can make a response to the questions above that shows in your heart of hearts that you really consider such crimes serious anti-social, anti-person offenses, and not a suitable subject for the charades type games you invite us to play.


Art Deco (Wayne A. Fox)
deco at moscow.com




----- Original Message ----- 
From: Glenn Schwaller 
To: vision2020 at moscow.com 
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And Justice for All


Word has it that a recently (May 2007) released multiple sex offender may be on his way back to jail as a result of a probation violation.

He was convicted in 2005 of lewd conduct with a minor child under the age of 16.  (Note: he is not a level 3 sex offender.  Idaho has no such designation).  While serving his sentence in the Latah County jail, he was afforded time out to drive himself to treatment and counseling.  Once released, it seems as though there was considerable delay in getting his photo posted on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry site, causing some residents to question practices and policies of the state with regard to making this information known to the public. 

If the supposed probation violation does result in his return to jail, can we mark one up for the good guys?

Schwaller


On 6/8/07, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
  KREM 2 just reported that Paris Hilton will return to jail today to serve 
  out the complete 45 days as originally sentenced.  Paris Hilton was shown
  leaving the courthouse screaming.

  This morning it was reported that the sheriff that reassigned Paris Hilton
  home for "undisclosed medical reasons" may be facing contempt of court 
  charges.

  Mark one up for the good guys, Moscow.

  Tom Hansen
  Moscow, Idaho

  "Uh, how about a 1-strike law. Death doesn't seem too extreme for a Level-3
  sex offender."

  - Dale "Comb-Over" Courtney (August 3, 2005) 




  =======================================================
  List services made available by First Step Internet,
  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
                 http://www.fsr.net
            mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
  =======================================================





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet, 
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
               http://www.fsr.net                       
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20070608/fb1fa078/attachment.html