[Vision2020] Joe can't tell the difference. (was "Campaign cotributions")
heirdoug at netscape.net
heirdoug at netscape.net
Thu Jul 19 08:44:32 PDT 2007
Joe,
Were not the statements you made part of your argument?
I also thought that the authority of the government derived it just
powers from the people it governs? I guess you tossed out the
constitution when you you became a "professional" philosopher!
doug!
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Campbell <joekc at adelphia.net>
To: heirdoug at netscape.net
Cc: vision2020 at moscow.com
Sent: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 7:56 am
Subject: Re: campaign contributions
Doug,
A fallacy is a fallacious argument. You quoted a statement (or maybe
two
statements) not an argument, so whatever it is it is not a fallacy.
This cheap point aside, I take it that you disagree with the
statement(s).
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree! One problem with your two
examples
is that Weitz has neither the power nor the authority of OSHA and the
government.
Best, Joe
---- heirdoug at netscape.net wrote:
=============
Joe,
Your statement below seems to me to be a fallacy. If you use the same
logic in the construction industry and OSHA came up to you would you
comply? The government uses "blackmail-style" pressure all the time to
make you change your habits.
Doug!
" for the simple reason that people do not respond well to
blackmail-style pressure. "
"Tell me, if someone sued you in an effort to get you to do something,
no matter how noble it was, would it increase or decrease your chance
of doing it?"
Best, Joe
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list