[Vision2020] campaign contributions

[Joe Campbell]

Donovan,

This is your reply? You more or less admit that Weitz’s lawsuit is based on his own sour grapes and has nothing to do with the law. And you totally missed my refutation of your standard "You can't comment about X because your biased” line.

And you seem to know me about as well as Crabtree does -- which is to say not at all. For the record, I have worked in a chain factory, a toy factory, as a bus boy, a delivery person, a cashier in a liquor store, a salesman in a sports store, a construction worker, a car salesman, a waiter, in lawn care and maintenance, and an assortment of odd jobs to pay my way through school right on up through the level of PhD.

Currently, I am co-editor of the Topics in Contemporary Philosophy published by MIT Press, with our fourth volume just out and another three on the way. Check out this link:

http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/browse/default.asp?cid=81

I am also a co-director of the Inland Northwest Philosophy Conference, one of the top philosophy conferences in the country. We even won an award from the Moscow Chamber of Commerce for bring folks from all over the world to the Moscow/Pullman. I'll stop there but there is more I could mention -- teaching awards, publications, etc.

It is ironic that after living half my life below the poverty level and working my way up to my current level of success I have to listen to people like you treat me like a prima donna. But I love my job as a philosopher and teacher and I realize that I am a very lucky man!

Best, Joe

---- Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com> wrote: 

=============
Joe Campbell wrote:
   
  "What exactly, Donovan, did you think that the MSD should have worked
out with Weitz? And for what reason?"
   
  I think they should have worked out better funding of vocational education and to reduce discrimination against non-college bound students. And for the reason of being fair and ensuring that public education provides equal benefit to all students as well as providing the students with some job related skills so they can be gainfully employed when they graduate high school.
   
  Joe also writes:
   
  "I'll save you the trouble and state your reply: "Since you are a teacher, Joe, your opinion is prejudiced and doesn't count." Thank God the issue isn't whether or not oxygen is essential to life or else we'd all be unable to comment! "
   
  You are incorrect here on three accounts. First, we all breath, so breathing would be an equal bias on all people, thus not making it a bias. Second, you would be the only person in education to state that being a teacher has not impacted their way of thinking. Third, and final, since you are philosophy teacher, you're biased in thinking that everyone can be a philosophy teacher rather than understanding standing some people want to be welders, carpenters, constructionists, nurses, drafters, operators, truckers, and machinists,--occupations that actually produce public wealth, not drain from it. 
   

  Best,
   
  Donovan


Joe Campbell <joekc at adelphia.net> wrote:
  Donovan writes: "It is unfortunate that MSD was unwilling to work with Dr. Weitz before he had to take them to court. I would image that such a reason has less to do with integrity and more to do with the size of the gap differences in opinion."

What exactly, Donovan, did you think that the MSD should have worked out with Weitz? And for what reason?

The merit of Weitz’s lawsuit has not yet been decided. Even the decision by the Deputy Attorney General, which Weitz and others keep circulating, states that the law is ambiguous and subject to two distinct interpretations, one of which is consistent with the MSD's actions. There is absolutely no reason for the MSD to work out a deal with Weitz, either before the election, or at the current moment. To do so would have been, or would be, irresponsible. The problem lies with the law, not with the MSD -- and this is true even if Weitz wins since that decision would set the legal precedent.

I'll save you the trouble and state your reply: "Since you are a teacher, Joe, your opinion is prejudiced and doesn't count." 

Thank God the issue isn't whether or not oxygen is essential to life or else we'd all be unable to comment! 

--
Joe Campbell

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Donovan Arnold 
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] campaign contributions
To: Shirley Ringo , vision2020 at moscow.com
Message-ID: <981907.401.qm at web38112.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Shirley,

You are without a doubt the best current legislature from Latah, and certainly have the most integrity of the three. But I am unable to find any vote you cast since 1999 which was in opposition to the MSD or IEA agenda or stated positions. If such disagreements exist between you and MSD and the IEA as you stated, please be so kind as to point out a few for us.

I am glad you are able to work out differences with the MSD before taking them to court. It is unfortunate that MSD was unwilling to work with Dr. Weitz before he had to take them to court. I would image that such a reason has less to do with integrity and more to do with the size of the gap differences in opinion. 

Again, I would like to hear to what differences between the MSD and yourself that you have worked out on behave of the people you represent. 

Best,

Donovan



=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet, 
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
http://www.fsr.net 
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================

 
---------------------------------
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.