[Vision2020] Mixed news for Wolves
lfalen
lfalen at turbonet.com
Wed Jan 31 15:47:14 PST 2007
I didn't say that you were unconcerned. Also I did not say that I wanted to exterminate wolves, just keep their numbers under control.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Sunil Ramalingam" sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:30:19 -0800
To: vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Mixed news for Wolves
> I think you're jumping to conclusions. I think it's appropriate to
> compensate those who lose stock to predation, but I also oppose the
> extermination of predators and support the reintroduction of wolves. That
> doesn't mean I am not concerned about those who raise livestock.
>
> Sunil
>
>
> >From: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> >Reply-To: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> >To: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>,
> >vision2020 at moscow.com
> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Mixed news for Wolves
> >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:03:13 -0800
> >
> >I don't know that they have said that directly, but the loss of livestock
> >to wolves does not seem to be of a concern or is minimized. That is the
> >same thing.
> >
> >Roger
> >-----Original message-----
> >From: "Sunil Ramalingam" sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
> >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:37:08 -0800
> >To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Mixed news for Wolves
> >
> > > Roger,
> > >
> > > How many people have said here they don't care about the livelihood of
> > > livestock producers?
> > >
> > > Sunil
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> > > >Reply-To: lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> > > >To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > >Subject: [Vision2020] Mixed news for Wolves
> > > >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:01:20 -0800
> > > >
> > > >Will
> > > > I am mostly in agreement with your statements on a balance in the
> > > >ecosystem. however I do not think that killing off old cow elk has
> >anything
> > > >to do with the productive of young ones. One thing that is missing is
> >the
> > > >disregard of the effects on livestock. I understand that you folks do
> >not
> > > >care about the lively hood of livestock producers, which is why you do
> >not
> > > >take this into consideration or downgrade it. I do not have a problem
> >with
> > > >maintaining some wolves, but they need to be controlled. They are much
> >more
> > > >dangerous than coyotes. I am a believer in multiple use. This includes
> > > >everyone, including livestock producers. I am a supporter of The Nature
> > > >conservancy. I used to be a member of the Audubon Society, but their
> >views
> > > >have became too one side. The Sierra Club has always ben too radical
> >for
> > > >me. As an aside, I was raised in the middle of what is called the
> >Owyhee
> > > >Initiative. Our place was about 50 miles from Jordan Valley, Oregon and
> >80
> > > >miles from Bruneau, Idaho. I supp!
> > > > ort the
> > > >Owyhee Imitative as do most of my former neighbors that still live
> >there.
> > > >
> > > >Roger
> > > >
> > > >=======================================================
> > > > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > > http://www.fsr.net
> > > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > >=======================================================
> > >
> > >
> > > =======================================================
> > > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > http://www.fsr.net
> > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > =======================================================
>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list