[Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules

[lfalen]

I agree. I would even be in favor of some tax incentives for companies that provide on site day care.

Rioger
-----Original message-----
From: "Ellen Roskovich" gussie443 at hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:40 -0800
To: lfalen at turbonet.com,  thansen at moscow.com,  suehovey at moscow.com,  graylex at yahoo.com,  vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules

> 
> 
> 
> On site daycare would be an ideal situation for so many working
> parents. . . that's why I was tickled pink when I thought it was going
> to become a reality for me.  That was back in 1971. . . and if the
> Feds can't/wont lead the way by example, I think it's going to
> continue to be an issue my grandkids will struggle with as I did.
> 
> Daycare needs to be regulated with background checks of caregivers and
> regular health inspections of kitchens, play areas and sleeping
> facilities.  We need to know our kids are safe.
> 
> Ellen Roskovich
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:  lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> Reply-To:  lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>
> To:  "Ellen Roskovich" <gussie443 at hotmail.com>, thansen at moscow.com,
> suehovey at moscow.com, graylex at yahoo.com, vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject:  Re: [Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules
> Date:  Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:12:01 -0800
> >I am glad you brought up on site day care.  This is something I have
> thought was a good idea for a long time for those companies that are
> big enough to do it. Obviously small companies can not. The statements
> by some Republicans that the voted against the day care bill, because
> mothers should stay at home is ridiculous. In an ideal world that
> would be desirable. There are many circumstances where that is not
> feasible. Single working mothers are only one example. Day care is
> needed and they need to be safe. Some allowances should be made for
> babysitter, but professional day care centers at least need some
> minimal rules to insure the kids are not put in harms way.
> >
> >Roger
> >-----Original message-----
> >From: "Ellen Roskovich" gussie443 at hotmail.com
> >Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:49:45 -0800
> >To: thansen at moscow.com,  suehovey at moscow.com,  graylex at yahoo.com,
> vision2020 at moscow.com
> >Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Panel Rejects Day-Care Rules
> >
> > > =======================================================
> > >  List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > >  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > >                http://www.fsr.net
> > >           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > =======================================================
> > >
> 
> 
> 
>  Don’t miss your chance to WIN 10 hours of private jet travel from
> Microsoft® Office Live